Actions Have Consequences

This is an open letter to you political snipers.

You know who you are. You’re the ones who like to drop little verbal stink bombs in our e-mail box and not leave your e-mail address. Yes, that’s you, the ones that aren’t man or woman enough to put at least an e-mail address next to your “opinions,” really empty, ranting vituperative about the content of this website. You don’t want to seem to have one of us have some sort of dialogue with you; maybe that shows how little confidence your hold in your own point of view, or your own ability to defend your point of view.

So I have to communicate collectively with all of you in this sort of broad-brush method.

Now that I have your attention…

Do you know what you are?

You’re all a bunch of MURDERERS.

Yes, MURDERERS.

One more time, M-U-R-D-E-R-E-R-S.

None of you have ever committed the sin of murder, or the crime of murder, or the tort of wrongful death. (This webmaster would like to think that that statement does not mean that we are extending much if any benefit of the doubt.)

And this webmaster is not making that accusation.

However, murder is not just a sin, or a crime, or a tort. Murder is also as much a result of political actions as it is a result of the commission of a sin, a crime or a tort.

You all should also realize that one of the basic tenets of the social science of human communication is that when you deliberately send any kind of message, including snide e-mails, you are communicating many messages about yourself and your beliefs, even if you don’t intend to do so. Some communication scientists think that the unintended messages that one communicates is a clue to one’s subconscious habits or conscious but concealed thoughts.

The reason you’re all a bunch of MURDERERS is that the net consequence of your political activity and advocacy is that white people are MURDERED by non-whites – not to mention being victims of all sorts of other kinds of violent crime at the hands of them.

Also, when you drop these insults in our e-mail box, the message you are communicating to us is that you countenance this proto-holocaust of whites at the hands of non-whites and feted by the white ruling class.

FACT: One hundred thousand (100,000) white people have been murdered by African-Americans (a.k.a. blacks, a.k.a. Negroes) since the early 1960s, according to an article in an Australian newspaper. That’s akin to the fatal casualty count of a major war – which should say a lot in itself. And we don’t think it’s a mere coincidence that “early 1960s” is mentioned, or that the murder count is higher since then – the early 1960s corresponds to the height of the legislative success of the “Civil Rights Movement” (i.e. Reconstruction II, 1954-Present, to match Reconstruction I, which was 1861-1876; funny, black crime against whites was sky-high then, too.)

All that blood is on your hands. Don’t they look good in red?

FACT: Robert Mugabe’s Zimbabwe and “liberated” South Africa are places where white people are being systematically holocausted by Negro mobs, not to mention land expropriations, property seizures, gang rape of whites by black mobs, etc. etc. ad nauseam. Of course all of you will respond by bitching about apartheid; during those years of racial wisdom, apartheid regimes NEVER committed these kinds of moral transgressions (at least to this degree) against black people.

Also you have to remember when whites first settled southern Africa, it was almost uninhabited by black/African tribes. It was only when white societies were created there that the Africans “found” some sort of native “rights” to it, i.e. they didn’t have any use for it until white people made something of it.

All your fault. Feeling guilty yet?

FACT: Radical extremists of the Mexican variety are plotting the “reconquista” of the American Southwest, despite the fact that the American government paid the Mexican government for both the larger land annexation of 1848, which itself was a spoil of our victory in the Mexican-American War, and the peaceful Gadsden Purchase of 1853. Once again, at that time, the Mexicans by-and-large didn’t want what is now the American Southwest; to wit: Those two annexations were only populated by 100,000 Mexicans at the time. But when white people make something of it, all of a sudden they want it back. (Sound familiar?)

Bringing it to today, white farmers and ranchers near the border are under a daily violent assault, in a pincher movement, the pressure from below is coming from swarms of illegal aliens and border-jumpers, (who often commit every sort of violent crime against “gringo”), and the pressure from above is coming from legal American citizens of Mexican descent, who exhibit racial solidarity and sympathy with the illegal aliens, and also white left-wing politicians who want Mexican votes, and the political whores of the white business establishment who want cheap labor. (See also: George W. Bu$h’s “non-amnesty” amnesty plan)

If you’re going to tell us that the Aztlan-on-the-brain reconquista insanity is only a radical movement within the Mexican-American community and the illegal alien community, and that our emphasis on it is an example of our “racist crackpottery,” you may or may not be right, but whether or not you are right is immaterial — even if the Mexes have no overt plans to “take back” the Southwest and drive “gringo” off his land (or kill him en masse), that will be the net effect of an American Southwest that is increasingly Mexican and decreasingly white, even if Southwestern states do not secede formally. Demography is destiny.

To compare it to a local example, East Saint Louis, Illinois is still part of the United States of America, only in the sense that its denizens pay taxes to Washington, D.C. or receive social insurance benefits from there (more the latter than the former), but make no mistake – it’s consummately unlivable for white people, those having been driven out by African-American denizens long ago. And so is the future of the Southwest – one big Chicano barrio, regardless of which country it belongs to.

And as it all comes down, as the white body count increases for the sake of it, the ball is in your hands, on your side of the court.

FACT: 9-11. It was (at least thus far) the ultimate, singular, one-moment act of racial jealousy concocted by non-whites against whites. Believe us, it was nothing more than that. And before some of you right-wing Jew-haters start flaming us, whining about “Israel this” and “Zionism that,” consider that wherever militant Islam goes, fighting and terrorism follows – and most extant, sustained conflicts between extremist Islam and some other group DOES NOT involve Jews in any way!

What does this have to do with any of you?

This webmaster will point you to a recent news article. Khalid Mohammed, the Ron Jeremy look-alike that was high-up in Al Qaeda, and hauled in by Uncle Sam in Afghanistan, told his captors that Al Qaeda was planning to carry out terrorist attacks against Japan when they hosted the 2002 World Cup of Soccer.

Mohammed then conceded that the attacks were not carried out because Al Qaeda had virtually no “ground network” of sleeper cells in Japan.

Gee, I wonder why they didn’t?

Could it POSSIBLY be because Japan’s immigration rules are so stringent, and so fanatically enforced, that the Japanese authorities won’t even let any of their non-Japanese yellow skinfolk settle permanently in Japan? They sure as hell won’t open the gates to Arab/Muslims at that!

No, I don’t think so!

Now, why do you think that our country is so replete with sleeper cells that an event like 9-11 could occur in the first place, and why law enforcement is preparing for one even more tragic, and why Tom Ridge is telling us to duct tape our windows and stockpile survival necessities?

None dare call it the Immigration Reform Act of 1965. You know, the one that changed the immigration rules from preferring whites (the “National Origin” system) to preferring non-whites.

And for all you far right-wing guerilla warfare/revolutionary/insurrectionist types, let that be a lesson. The only reason the ’65 Act was able to pass is because JFK was assassinated, and the act was passed in his “memory.” If he weren’t, then virtually none of his proposals in the areas of civil rights and immigration would have passed. He was about ready to be defeated in 1964. The only reason he went to Dallas in November of ’63 is because opinion polls of Texans showed up far behind Barry Goldwater in a presumptive Presidential election race, in the then-Vice President’s own state no less. If you all get what you want, it’s only going to make things a whole lot worse for everyone. In times of tumult, government tends to grow stronger and more politically left wing.

(Please don’t imply from the last paragraph that this webmaster believes the domestic right wing had anything to do with the JFK assassination. The point is that, for certain small sectors of the far right, assassination of public figures is a virtue, even if they don’t carry them out.)

It also doesn’t help that you left-wing diversity maniacs have undermined legitimate domestic safety valves (a.k.a. racial profiling). Had there been effective racial profiling around Logan International Airport in Boston, many of the eventual 9-11 hijackers would have not been able to carry out their pernicious deeds.

The hard truth of the matter, though, is that plain ole ordinary white people here in the good ole US of A, as well as whites in other countries, have experienced their personal 9-11 attacks for a long time, attacks by other sorts of non-whites, and feted by their white ruling classes, but still motivated by the same sort of racial jealousy that animates dung heaps of human trash like Osama Bin Laden and any of his lieutenants and prot�g�s.

All of the above facts can only lead to these conclusions: (1) Non-white people want what white people have, but on their own terms and under their own tutelage, without white authority or even white presence. (2) Race comes first. Everything else is ultimately negotiable. Every race in the world realizes this but the white ruling class and you left-wing dip sticks that flame our e-mail box. (3) Diversity isn’t always positive.

It certainly doesn’t help your case that nearly all of you are probably opposed to Middle American Empowerment legislation (a.k.a. Conceal-Carry). The fact that you would rather not see the ordinary person with the legal authority to defend him or her self with a deadly weapon is also akin to saying you would rather see them dead. MURDERER!

You all are about ready to blow your heads off with all the steam building up in it, in reaction to the rantings and ravings that have preceded in this space. You’re also wondering what any of you have to do with any of this, and what did you do that was so bad that we would call you murderers.

Actions have consequences. (What a concept!) Sometimes, actions have unintended consequences, ones that the actors do not like. But the absence of intent of a consequence of an action does not preclude the consequence from occurring.

The action of being for civil rights (Ted Kennedy’s definition), or the action of advocating racial equality, or the action of supporting the Martin Luther King holiday and legacy, or the action of praising Adolph (Abraham) Lenin (Lincoln), or the action of pulling that lever for that straight Democrat ticket election-in and election-out, or even for many Republicans, or the action of sending e-mails to this webmaster moaning about how “abhorrent” you think the content is — all those actions have the consequences of creating a system, or a scheme.

Such a system, far from being fair, or equitable, is in reality almost as unfair and discriminatory as you contend that the “white supremacist”/segregation/apartheid system was, only this time, it is without involuntary servitude, but it features white men without “connections” at a blatant disadvantage. At the same time, the white-run New Utopia teaches non-white population blocs that white people are at fault for everything from black economic poverty to hung toenails, even as white-run New Utopia simultaneously instructs white people that race is a fictional construct, and only has relevance to the ratio of dermal melanin.

Combined with that, New Utopia treats African-American and Chicano criminality with kid gloves. And when you add to it the biological realities of the racial differences in normal-distribution IQ levels, and the differences of average testosterone levels among the gentlemen of the races (whites-Chicanos-blacks from lowest to highest), it’s no wonder that African-Americans and Chicanos are on figurative head-hunting expeditions for “honkey” and “gringo,” respectively.

All this webmaster knows is this: If someone did a lobotomy on him to take out much of his frontal lobe, and then with quasi-official imprimatur pumped propaganda into his head day-in and day-out that some other group was responsible for all his existing foibles and failures, he, too would convert to Islam, buy an AK, and then mow down the nearest person belonging to the “oppressive” ethnic group.

It’s only going to get worse; as the “civil rights revolution” further decimates what’s left of the criminal justice system in Diverse America, the trend will only continue upward until the non-whites have either killed or driven out all the whites in sight (see also: Zimbabwe, South Africa, Haiti, a number of other formerly white colonies in Africa).

“Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them” – Matthew 7:20. By the net consequence of your political actions, we understand you.

This brings up another rub. Some of you, in your complaining, claim that our political activity is un-Christian, because Christianity ordains racial equality. Of course, this webmaster is nothing more than a hack amateur theologian, but he cannot find anything in the Old or New Testaments demanding that human societies engage in egalitarianism.

This webmaster also finds it strange that it has only been in the last half-century or so that Christian churches “found” this “calling” to be universalist, so it leads this webmaster to believe that the propensity for universalism (including racial equality) within Christian Churches today is merely a symptom of Churches whoring themselves to Babylon.

Compare that to C.F.W. Walther, who was one of the principal founders of the Missouri Synod Lutheran Church. On the verge of the War Between The States, he instructed young Lutheran gentlemen who were about join the Union Army that (paraphrased): “If you want to go to fight to free the slaves, go ahead, but don’t say that God told you to do so, because he didn’t.”

Beyond that, this webmaster’s best advice to you Christian egalitarians is similar: If you feel in your heart of hearts that equality is the best route for a civil society to follow, then you have as much right to lobby for that paradigm as we do for what we think. But don’t go e-flaming us telling us that we’re going to go to Hell because God doesn’t agree, because that’s not the case, at least in His Revealed, Inspired Word. I would point to you the very last admonition in the very last book of the New Testament. Read it, live it, love it, learn it.

Before we end this rant, it’s also time to flame the Old Reprobate whose birthday we are upon.

This webmaster is sure that the equivocation between Abraham Lincoln and the first name of Adolph Hitler and the surname of V.I. Lenin will invoke a couple of flames, especially from some of you “neo-Confederate” types who delude yourself into thinking that the Southern Confederacy of 1861-65 was purely an egalitarian exercise. You will dutifully tell me about Lincoln’s very “politically incorrect” statements on race, statements that would place him well into the “white supremacist” category today. You will also tell me about his repatriationist rhetoric.

The response to that foolishness is fundamentally the same as the response to the left-wing nutbars that we are devoting this space to slapping around. “By their fruits, ye shall know them.” – Matthew 7:20.

This webmaster’s personal assessment of the 16th President derives from his actions, especially his actions in conducting the enemy side of the War Between The States. Granted, Lincoln’s childhood situation and upbringing leads this webmaster to believe that his “supremacist” attitude was his heartfelt one; you know how that goes, will the real Abe Lincoln please stand up.

Poor white southerners of the era (of which Lincoln was born into) were both fearful of black revelry and hostile to the slave system, which hindered the creation of a bona fide middle class. In the antebellum South, there was virtually no middle ground between “Being To The Plantation Born” and being hard scrabble dirt poor. We believe that Lincoln’s decision to invade Dixie was as much a result of his personal vengeance as it was his doing the bidding for the newly-rising ruling class north of the Mason-Dixon line.

Even at that, don’t take Lincoln out of context. By the time the WBTS was in full swing, Lincoln did develop the bad habit of telling one group of people one thing, and another group of people something totally contradictory. (See also: Kerry, J.F.). Lincoln’s “supremacist”/repatriationist words of the war era can be matched by egalitarian and pro-Lincoln scholars, such as Ray Yitzana, almost word for word, speech for speech, with evidence that Lincoln “really” was an exponent of true-blue equality.

Both Lincolns are right, and both are wrong. The answer to that riddle was that Lincoln was a typical whore politician who would say anything to get anyone to like him. So if Lincoln was a bigot at heart, it was immaterial to the situation. The only difference between then and today is that Lexis-Nexis and the Drudge Report did not exist in the 1860s; if they did then even the most dim-witted public-spirited citizen of either country would have seen Lincoln for the two-timing two-faced cretin that he was.

But still, talk is cheap, cheaper than dirt. The net consequence of Mr. Lincoln’s actions is that military force representing the paradigm of racial equality and the consolidation of power necessary to enforce it, all for the better business interests of the rising industrial ruling class based in the northeastern seaboard, defeated the military force representing the better interests of the southern, agricultural establishment that depended on free labor and free trade to thrive.

In that, we wound up with a Frankenstein U.S. Just-Us Department that runs almost totally unchecked, and can get away with almost anything (locking dentists up in Federal prison hospitals for years without a trial and trying to claim they need to be doped up with nut medication because they need to fry their brains so they can’t call the cowboy Federal law enforcement out for all their terrorism and abuse), and there’s not a damned thing we can do about it, short of hoping that Attorney General John A**croft looks up “hypocrite” in the dictionary and sees his visage next to it; maybe then he’ll repent of his civil transgressions.

We need to tie a noose around the neck of the statue of Abraham Lincoln that is placed in the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., and topple it just as the Romanians did to monuments to Nicolai Ceausescu, and the Russians to Stalin/Lenin, and the Iraqis to the “Mad Ass Shoe Shine Boy” Saddam Hussein – and fundamentally for the same reason, philosophically speaking. Anything less would be an affront to Dr. Sell.

Think we’re engaging in hyperbole when we mention Lincoln in the same breath as Lenin and Stalin? Remember, during the Spanish Civil War, when Marxist nutcases tried to gut Spain of all its traditions and folkways with the veneer of state legitimacy, groups of left-wing and communist-sympathizing Americans went to Spain to fight as mercenaries for the Communist government against the “mutiny” of the legitimate Spanish Army headed by General Francisco Franco. That American mercenary force was called the Abraham Lincoln Brigade.

The only reason there’s a modicum of individual liberty left in this country (and there is, to wit: This website; in most other heretofore white countries, this website would probably be considered illegal “hate speech” as deemed by the Lenin-wing rat finks that run their governments), is because for some reason, our magistrates are adamant about striking down governmental restrictions on what lawyers call “fully protected” expression.

However, liberty and equality are diametrically opposing concepts. Practical experience shows us that the more of one necessarily leads to the less of the other. So after another generation or two of the political consequences of the actions that Mr. Lincoln started and you left-wing detractors of this website endorse, the liberty of thought, conscience and political expression which we can still enjoy at present time will go by the wayside, as if it were a quaint, anachronistic highway-side relic that’s worth glancing at for a few seconds as we traverse down the road to the People’s Paradise.