Great Danes

Lately there has been news about how some cartoons in Denmark are irritating the Moslems. They are (surprise!) threatening Europeans for daring to dishonor the great Mohammed, or Muhammad, or whatever the hell the guy’s name is wearing the sheets and towel. I found the offending cartoons and submitted them to the St. Louis CofCC Webmaster, so that they may be uploaded to this website for downloading and viewing, if anyone cares to see them. It is all in one piece.

While I don’t understand the foreign language in the captions, they don’t seem all that bad otherwise. No farm animal or child molesting is going on. The only funny one shows an Arabic guy in heaven telling a line of smoldering newly-arriving bombers that they ran out of virgins.

Other publishers in Europe reran the cartoons as a sign of solidarity. I thought we could too. Draw an anti-Islamic cartoon and put it on your refrigerator. If you have the guts and can afford to lose your job, put one up at work, too – Right next to the picture of the burning towers on September 11th. Or did they make you take that one down already so it wouldn’t offend somebody?

–D.F.

[Webmaster's Note: D.F. later sent me this link to what appears to be an England-based Islamic extremist organization. Read some of the words on that site, and then compare them to the anti-white, anti-police rant quoted in the blog post, "The First Embers." Eerie, isn't it? I wonder why authorities in the UK haven't tried to string these people up on "Hate Speech" charges like they just tried to do to Nick Griffin.]

And The Beat Goes On

From the Reuters News Service:

The United States backed Muslims on Friday against European newspapers that printed caricatures of the Prophet Mohammad in a move that could help America’s battered image in the Islamic world.

Inserting itself into a dispute that has become a lightning rod for anti-European sentiment across the Muslim world, the United States sided with Muslims outraged that the publications put press freedom over respect for religion.

“These cartoons are indeed offensive to the belief of Muslims,” State Department spokesman Kurtis Cooper said in answer to a question.

I wonder if the dipsticks in the State Department actually believe that OBL will now love us just a little bit more.

But the United States, which was founded by immigrants fleeing religious persecution, has previously spoken out against publications offensive to believers of other faiths.

This means our State Department thinks that, because once upon a time, white Europeans had stiff debates with each other about Christian theology, we should today throw our white European brothers over a cliff to satisfy a racio-religious movement which hates both white Europeans and white Americans.

The First Embers

I have made the contention to myself that all the vitriolic rhetoric concerning the Great Cop Chase of 2006 originating from the city’s civil rights industry and from certain radio shows on WGNU will inspire and provoke some crackpot to murder some white people, perhaps white police officers. Of course, whoever is so “inspired” will conveniently forget that one of the four officers surrounding PTB Edmon Burns and dutifully taking care of business was a black St. Louis city cop.

The following was a post on the local St. Louis left-wing blog site St. Louis Independent Media Center. Officials with the website, and local civil rights leaders, have rightfully denounced this post and its message, and a consensus among bloggers on this site is that this post is a disingenuous fake meant to discredit their movement. But knowing what I know about some of our radical bretheren of color and some of their white “anarchist” far-left fellow travellers, I think it’s just as likely to be heartfelt and genuine.

As an aside, this is why this website does not have any auto-feedback or “message board” capability. If it did, I could imagine that a some trolls would post friendly and enthusiastic messages about a certain German dictator from the last century. Our fundamentally dishonest MSM would then assume that the Council of Conservative Citizens officially shares the same ideology.

The post is advertised as public domain, so the following re-post should not be construed as a copyright violation. The original post may be found here, In case it has been removed, here is the full text in italics:

Footage of the savage attack on a Black man by 4 or more white cops (the type of incident that occurs daily in STL) is proof that white cops, their families, and their supporters deserve to die.

News copter footage captured a mob of white cops (3 from Maplewood, 1 city cop) brutally attacking a Black man. The cowardly cops slammed the man’s head into a brick wall, knocked him to the ground, and hit him hundreds of times. Two cops held him down while a third repeatedly kicked him in the groin and a fourth (weighing at least 250 pounds) repeatedly jumped up and down on his ankles, causing multiple fractures. The man is apparently blind from eye injuries and at this time, his condition is critical.

This type of incident occurs on a daily basis in the St. Louis area. All Black men know this. Many white men know this, as they’re often accused of beating their wife or girlfriend when their in-laws sic the cops on them.

Without exception, all white cops condone this act.

A list should be made listing the name, address, photo, and all family members of all white cops. Failing that, any white female should be assumed the wife, daughter, mother, etc, of a cop.

Whenever a cop misbehaves, the cop’s white loved ones should be raped and killed. This negative reinforcement is the ONLY way to keep the cops in line.

The fact that the four cops are alive is proof justice does not exist.

Very soon there will be a HUGE riot in which no whites will survive. A brick to the head will seem mild compared to what will happen to whites in the upcoming riots.

F— the police! Show me a cop-killer and I’ll show you a hero!

There are going to be a lot more cops who will lose the use of their legs.

If a cop breeds a white baby, the baby’s skull should be bashed against brick walls. The white pregnant wives of white cops should have their bellies struck with baseball bats and tire irons. That’s what all white cops did to pregnant Black women and still do today.

The only good white cop is a DEAD white cop.

Any white tourist who sets foot in the city limits deserves to be sent back in a body bag.

I think I’m reading revolution in the air, tell me brother, talk to me sister.

Civil Rights Group Calls For More Violent Crime

The St. Louis NAACP held a press conference this afternoon. Among other things, NAACP leaders called for a metropolitan area wide coordinated policy among police departments for high speed police chases (i.e. no police chases allowed), and a metro area wide civilian review board (second guessing board).

If the St. Louis NAACP gets everything it called for this afternoon, black crime (and white crime, for that matter) will skyrocket, because both policies have the disparate impact of de-policing, which serves to the benefit of criminals.

Befuddled

From ABC News:

In the midst of fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan along with the global war on terror, leaders of the Pentagon today declared war on an editorial cartoon…..The cartoon, by Washington Post editorial cartoonist Tom Toles, uses a disabled soldier as a metaphor for a damaged Army…..Rumsfeld was asked about the dispute today but demurred. “No one questions the right of a cartoonist to do what they want to do and people do it all the time. They’ve been doing it for decades,” Rumsfeld said at the National Press Club. “People made fun of George Washington, they just brutally savaged Abraham Lincoln.”

Donald Rumsfeld, George Washington. I get ‘em mixed up all the time.

In fifty years, if Rummy’s face is on the $1 bill instead of George Washington, then come back to me and tell me I’m all wet.

Many critics of the Iraq war think that Donald Rumsfeld’s face should be on the $3 bill. Sorry people, I already have that honor reserved for Morris Dees.

A Closed World and a Contradictory Mind

From ZDNet.com’s Technology Blogger George Ou:

Open Source has always prided itself in openness, but why is the Mozilla Foundation patching security flaws without disclosing what they are…..It’s a mystery why Mozilla is operating in secrecy with Open Source code and one can only speculate about the motivations…..It’s one thing to keep vulnerabilities secret when there is no fix because no one wants zero-day vulnerabilities, but patching holes and not telling people what the problem was just seems wrong.

On the one hand, critics of the Open Source Software movement maintain that having the source code for a given piece of software freely downloadable and viewable will mean that any given vulnerabilities in that software will be more widely broadcast and subject to exploit, in contrast to proprietary (closed) source software, whose security is found in its secrecy. (In the real world, the opposite turns out to be true.)

But on the other hand, Mr. Ou here has just said that it was wrong for the Mozilla Corporation to keep secret most bugs it just fixed in the Firefox 1.5.0.1 release. Truthfully, I doubt that the list o’bug fixes were exactly a trade secret for the Mozillians; if you know where to look, you could have probably found them even before the rollout of 1.5.0.1. But taking the former argument at its word, Mr. Ou should be happy that the matter of fact in the latter argument did happen.

The Mozillians do not have to climb to the top of the tallest building in Mountain View, California and yell out every bug in every release of their software in order to be consistent with the Open Source philosophy. If they did, Mr. Ou and other OSS critics should be the first ones to be upset.