In order to comply with state laws that prohibit discrimination against transgendered individuals, the University of Vermont’s new campus student center not only has restrooms for those archaic, antiquated gender classifications of “men” and “women,” but “gender-neutral” facilities for the transgendered/transsexual. The trouble with that, aside from the obvious rantings that this somewhat prudish moralist could do in this space, is that if you’re going to have these “gender-neutral” restrooms along with those for men and women, the only people who will use the g/n facilities are the t/g and the t/s.
Fox News:
“A multi-use bathroom doesn’t necessarily feel safe to transgendered students, because they have concerns about how their gender would be read by others,” said Dot Brauer, director of the school’s Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Questioning and Ally Services.
In other words, we shouldn’t interpret these g/n restrooms as “unisex,” because of the presence of men’s and women’s restrooms, and for the reasons that Miss Brauer gave above. Gender-neutral facilities are essentially a codeword for, and designed for, t/g and t/s.
Also, now we’re supposed to think of “Questioning” and “Ally” in the same league as GLBT itself. Maybe the department could be expanded to “Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender, Transsexual, Questioning, Confused, and Ally Services.”
Also:
But Brauer said the school can do more. She wants to see more gender-neutral bathrooms in the library, and private showers in the gym.
So what she is saying is that there should be more private (rather than communal) showers in both “genders’” locker rooms. So this means that Miss Brauer thinks that transgendered people should use the locker rooms of their biological gender, but have privately partitioned shower space or stalls. Whatever harassment they would supposedly receive in an “old-fashioned” single-gender restroom or a unisex restroom such that the University has to put in “gender-neutral” restrooms would be far worse in a space where people are expected to cavort naked or near-naked much of the time. At this rate, why not create gender-neutral locker rooms?
And if the sensitivities of people in their semi-private collective space are so imporant now, does the University of Vermont allow women journalism students to nose their way into men’s locker rooms to “interview” (i.e. check out) male athletes?