For as many times as I’ve heard “we’re all in this together” uttered by speakers at the DNC today and yesterday, I was thinking that this wasn’t the Democrat National Convention, but a rehearsal for “High School Musical.”
Again, with the exception of the first half of HRC’s speech, most of tonight’s speakers spouted the same lines and bromides. Though it was somewhat different from last night, so it seems as if David Axelrod wrote another speech overnight.
Speaking of which, I get the feeling that the Democrat establishment have it in their minds that the only reason Bush won two national elections is because of Karl Rove. Now you know my opinion of Karl Rove-r-rated and political advisors in general: I wouldn’t give you two cents for most of them. Political advisors get all the credit if their guy or gal happens to win, whether or not their advice and strategies were the reason for the victory. If you luck out by being the advisor for enough winning candidates, you’ll rise through the ranks of that profession.
George W. Bush won two national elections in spite of Karl Rove, not because of him. (Verily, I think most of Rove’s advice was stupid. Hispanic Strategy, anyone?) However, that’s what many Dems think. The reason they think that is because of the psychological phenomenon of “transferrance.” You tend to see in other people qualities you know that you have yourself. For instance, if you tend to think that most other people are dirty, filthy, lying rat finks, you’re likely a dirty, filthy, lying rat fink yourself. If the Democrats think that Bush’s success is entirely Rove-r-rated, then this means the Democrats know that any of their success comes from their Roves, such as David Axelrod. Being as Democrat strategists, as a tendency, are somewhat brighter and more astute than the Republican ones, it’s more the truth for them.
However, this means that they have handed over the keys to the party and the mortgages to all their souls to David Axelrod. As such, virtually everything this party says and does up until November will be conceived and approved by Axelrod. If Obama wins, then Axelrod will get all the credit, even if his advice was half baked and had nothing to do with it.
***
A few points on Mark Warner’s address, which was the keynote of the convention. I noticed he used the word “Bangalore” in a snarky sense. Again, this is the continuing Axelrod effort to make you think the Democrats are against free trade and outsourcing, without actually being against free trade and outsourcing. (Hint: Larry Ellison gives almost all of his political donations to Democrats. Warren Buffet, who has made most of his fortune based on the rising stock values of corporations that become all the more profitable because of cheap labor and outsourcing, is an Obama economic advisor.) Warner said that if a job can be done in Bangalore, it can be done in Danville, Virginia. Trouble is, Mark, most of those jobs that were done in Danville are now being done in Bangalore because the labor is dirt cheap in Bangalore. And if the job can’t be moved to Bangalore, then they move Bangalore to Danville, with H-1-B visas.
***
HRC may have had the words, but she didn’t have the music. She did not look happy at all having to deliver this speech. If not for her hands constantly being in front of her, I could well imagine that she would have had one hand with crossed fingers behind her back the whole time. As it was, she certainly didn’t appear spirited, and seemed like she was delivering this speech as if she was just going through the motions, dry and technocratic like.