
I first cut teeth in the Linux world in December 2004, when I gave Linspire a spin. After having tested several distros, I settled on SUSE (now openSUSE) from 9.2, which was current at that time, up until the current stable release, 11.0.
While I have been waiting for 11.1, I heard about the coming Fedora 10. Now, I auditioned Fedora starting at version 6 (when it was called Fedora Core), and tried 7 and 8. For some reason, I didn’t give 9 a try, but I heard a lot of good things about it and 10, which was released yesterday. Since openSUSE 11.1 won’t go final until December 18, I decided to d/l Fedora 10 and give it a try.
And I like it a lot. So much so that, if openSUSE 11.1 isn’t anything special, I’m going to stay with Fedora.
What’s to like?
(1) Because the DVD iso for the 32-bit version is only 3.4 GiB, it doesn’t take as long to download as if, like openSUSE, it took up close to the entire space of a DVD, that being 4.37 GiB. The drawback to Fedora is that it doesn’t include any proprietary software packages, but, since the package manager is easier than in openSUSE (see below), getting them is simple. And, openSUSE will stop including proprietary packages staring with version 11.1, so it will gain the advantage of being a smaller dowload, but the disadvantage of not having proprietary packages, and you having to wade through YaST to get them.
(2) During the install process for Fedora, partitioning your hard drives is somewhat easier than it is on openSUSE. What helps is the graphical indicator of your hard drives, where they already have partitions, and where they do not. Also, selecting the software install pattern in Fedora is easier than in OS, because making any change in OS’s package selection scheme requires several seconds to reset itself, with Fedora, you either say yes or no to a package, and it’s instantly selected or deselected.
(3) Since OS 10.3, I have not been a big fan of GNOME in openSUSE. What they did was to create a start menu like Windows Vista and KDE 4.x, (openSUSE also used a KDE 4.x-style start slab in KDE 3.5.x for OS 10.3 and newer, differentiating KDE 3.5.x in OS from the upstream KDE releases of the same version number, all of which I liked btw), to mach what Novell offered in Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED) 10, the stable and mature Linux version that they “sell,” really to make money on support and services. Though I use KDE more than GNOME, when I do play around with GNOME, I always preferred (and still do) stock GNOME over openSUSE’s modifications. Fedora makes very few changes in GNOME between upstream and distribution. They also leave KDE 4.1.x alone, then again, since OS did the same for KDE 4.0.x, I don’t think 11.1 will modify 4.1.x, so OS never seems to modify KDE 4.
(4) The default fonts in both KDE and GNOME in Fedora 10 seem a lot more consistent, clear and readable than they ever have been in OS. I have always thought this about Fedora since I first started testing it, even if Fedora had a lot of other problems that made a non-starter in my opinion.
(5) Similar to how software selection during installation is easier in F10 than in OS (see 2), PackageKit in the installed Fedora, both in GNOME and KDE, is easy to use, and dead obvious.
(6) The only disadvantage is that KDE in F10 does not come with the variety of screensavers and wallpapers by default that KDE 4 in OS does. However, GNOME in F10 has more default screensavers and wallpapers than GNOME in OS. It seems to me that Red Hat, Fedora’s parent, prefers GNOME for both Fedora and the business-oriented Red Hat distribution, while Novell prefers KDE for SLED/SLES/OS, though the use of their sucky modified GNOME for SLED makes me doubt my theory.
(7) The GRUB bootloader, which F10 wants to plop in the MBR by default, but it can be changed to go at the beginning of the root Linux partition, when installing F10, while it’s not eyecandy like OS’s GRUB, but it has the neat default option of directly booting the user-defined default OS without seeing a menu (for a lot of people, Microsoft Windows XP or Vista would be the default, while Fedora would be a second option), unless the user hits Enter, at which time they would get the menu of all bootable OSes. GRUB in OS forces the menu on you, when you either do nothing and boot up the user-defined default OS, or choose one by hand and hit Enter. BTW, OS by default installs GRUB at the beginning of the root Linux partition, (though you can change this at installation), and I think that’s preferrable, because fixing your MBR to delete Linux bootup options isn’t easy if you decide to uninstall a Linux distro such the *buntus that put its GRUB in the MBR and does not allow you to change that (usually you have to delete a whole distro off your HD by manually deleting Linux partitions using a tool like GParted).
(8) OpenOffice in openSUSE or its commercial cousins, a version that is called “Novell edition” because Novell tweaks the OOo codebase, sux. I have always liked stock OOo better than Novell’s modified OOo. Fedora has always used stock, and now that I like Fedora enough overall to make it my prime distro, I finally have stock.
Download Fedora 10.
***