The Post-Dispatch did something out of character today, and that is write about a black-on-white crime. It was of a VA Med Center Oncology Nurse murdered in her home on Hickory Street on the near South Side; it all happened early Monday morning. The suspects also shot an off-duty police woman and her boyfriend. The angle of the P-D article is that four different generations were in the house when the four black thugs invaded. However, these paragraphs caught my eye about the alleged ringleader:
The older suspect — Mario Coleman, 22, of the 5300 block of Cabanne Avenue — was charged Monday night with 12 felonies, including the murder of Stallis. He’s being held in jail on a $1 million, cash-only bail. The 16-year-old boy is in juvenile custody. Police won’t release his name unless he is charged as an adult.
Court records indicate that Coleman pleaded guilty to felony burglary and felony theft in 2007, but got a suspended imposition of sentence and placed on probation for three years. In 2008, court records indicate, Coleman pleaded guilty to a felony unlawful use of a weapon charge and, again, got a suspended execution of sentence and was placed on supervised probation.
An SIS for felony burglary and theft, and then an SIS for an U/U/W. Did the U/U/W happen after the first SIS was imposed, or did the U/U/W happen at the same time or before the burglary and theft? Because if he pulled the U/U/W while on SIS/probation for the burg/theft, then the SIS should have been revoked and he should have been sent to state prison to start doing time that had been suspended for the burg/theft, and then later the U/U/W would have been disposed, either in a longer prison stint, or time concurrent with his burg/theft time, or extra probation, or an SIS starting with his release from the burg/theft.
Even a justice system as lenient and pro-black as St. Louis City would not punish an SIS violation with another SIS. This is why I think the U/U/W and the Burg/Theft happened at the same time. Then again, I could be wrong, and St. Louis City could be that crazy.
So much for “supervised probation.”
UPDATE 10/7: I did some “research” over at St. Louis City Cop Talk, and evidently, the St. Louis City Circuit IS that crazy. What’ s worse, I am told, is that an SIS for a felony doesn’t even show up as a felony on your rap sheet, even if the SIS punishes another SIS violation. And this is the case for an SIS that is currently extant, i.e. you’re still serving time that was previously suspended. I would have assumed that the crime that you committed to get an SIS would stay on your sheet forever, unless you got an “expiration date” SIS; what that means is that if you behave during the SIS period and perhaps some “probation” time afterward, the original crime will be wiped off your sheet, the courts tend to do this for younger people as a sort of “free pass” card for not fully developed and sophomoric brains. Therefore, you can get one SIS, violate it, get punished with another SIS, violate them both, punished with another SIS, so on and so on, and still not have a felony sheet such that it it’s a gun or anything else disqualifier. And, according to my source, Jennifer “The Truth Squader” Joyce knows about it and signs off on it. So it’s not just the judges, it’s Joyce. Why does that not surprise me?
This is evidently a deficiency at the MO state level. It can be solved by changes in state law that states that violating an SIS stains your rap sheet for whatever violation, misdem or felony, the SIS was originally about, and that an SIS cannot be punished with another SIS.
UPDATE 10/8: I also found out on STL Cop Talk that there is one judge of the St. Louis City Circuit that is almost singlehandedly responsible for one Mr. Mario Coleman getting slap on the hand after slap on the hand. I won’t say the name, but I do think about this in light of an ongoing effort to dump the Missouri Plan Nine from Outer Space. On the margins, the Plan Nine marginally accrues to the benefit of lenient judges in St. Louis and Kansas City, because the only possible opposition to, e.g. the judge who couldn’t be bothered to enhoosegow Mr. Coleman in spite of numerous offenses is the world “no.” I mean, who the hell is “no” and why would s/he be a better judge than the one in question that I won’t name? At least with another human being on the other side of the ballot, you have a known quantity vs another known quantity. And in the very rare circumstance that a judge is bounced out in accordance with Plan Nine, the Governor gets to appoint a replacement. Knowing the Governor Missouri has now, and which racial minority he’s been trying to suck up to since the late 1990s after he dared use his power as AG to dismantle forced busing, Jaybird Nixon would appoint another lenient lib to replace the lenient lib in question. The human opponent to this particular judge would at least talk conservative to get elected.
