The civil wrongs crowd is already pushing in that direction, and I’m sure this thing in the White House would do it. Today is the 150th Anniversary of his execution.
But the reason that John Brown shouldn’t be pardoned is because he was trying to provoke another Haiti.
The Haitian “Revolution” (i.e. attempted genocide of whites by blacks, spearheaded by mulattoes) early in the 19th century affected the consciousness of the Southern slave-holding class until the WBTS. This is why most slave states seemed to have insane laws on their books. They only seem insane to today’s sensibilities, but made perfect sense in context. One such law was that no person was allowed to give blacks literacy lessons, i.e. teach them how to read. MO had such a law, and groups who wanted to teach St. Louis’s blacks how to read chartered steamboats and riverboats to cruise the Illinois part of the Mississippi River near St. Louis (IL never had such a law) and literacy lessons were held onboard. The modern mind would interpret that as racist oppression. But the reason these laws were enacted was that the slave holding class feared that a little learning was a dangerous thing.
BTW, if you don’t know what that phrase means, it means that half-witted people with feeble minds wouldn’t interpret facts and information they learned in context, and would not bother to realize that there is a “rest of the story” to things they have learned, and bother to discover these additional facts, and their feeble minds would run with that information in crazy and insane and paranoid directions. In other words, a mind that can only absorb so much and only absorbs the little bit it can thinks that it’s a lot more smarter than it actually is, only because it’s like the thimble of water filled up to the top, compared to that half-full gallon of the savant next to him. The phrase has its roots in the literature of Alexander Pope.
Plug that into 1850s America, the slave holding class didn’t want blacks (free or slave) to learn how to read because they knew they wouldn’t be able to use that knowledge to read Shakespeare and Milton and Newton. Their new-found half-baked literacy of (even then) what they knew to be the typical feeble black mind would inevitably be led in the direction of Haitian-style revolution and anti-white ethnic cleansing, with the white slave holders being the obvious first targets. Furthermore, organized efforts at the time to teach blacks how to lead had very close links to those, like John Brown, who espoused Haitian-style insurrectionist rhetoric. Brown’s insurrection, though it was not aimed directly at a slave owner, was seen (and probably was indeed) the first step in that direction. This is why the Federal government, still predominated by Southern politicians even in 1859, came down hard and fast on Brown.
As an aside, look at how well black literacy has worked out today. Most American blacks know how to read, and what has this led to? Louis Farrakhan, Al Sharpton, kook theories once taken seriously in the black community that jeans were being doused in secret formulas meant to sterilize black men, the theory that the K-with-circle logo on labels of Snapple Tea meant the Ku Klux Klan (it really means Kosher for Jewish consumption), spaceships orbiting the Earth, Afrocentrism, Egypt was black, Cleopatra was black, Martin Luther King is God, and so on and so forth. “The more insane an idea is, the more illogical it is, the more nonsensical it is, the more likely it is to be accepted as common currency in the black community. It is a linear relationship.” — EPH III
Or, to put it as Alexander Pope might have, a little learning can be a dangerous thing.