* I want to start with this missive on Majority Rights today. I agree with some of it, I think a lot of it is sarcastically humorous, (which is why I’m recommending it), but overall, for someone to bash every other right-winger in America, of both the racial and non-racial variety, by name, then turn around and call for a white partition, all the while doing so anonymously, comes off as infantile.
It should be noted that a lot of Americans who are just as white (presumably) as s/he is, just as right-wing as s/he is (including in some ways I’m not, see below), and given to reasonable criticism of fellow right-wingers as s/he might have the ability to engage in if s/he could just lose the snark for just a moment, think an explicitly white racial partition of the United States is a bad idea for white Americans. Their reasoning varies from person to person, but some think that white Americans ceding control of coast-to-coast territory would give China and India beachheads on the North American continent to where they can squeeze white Americans out of existence, while others think that whites would fuck up/liberal up their partition just like they fucked up/liberaled up America as a whole.
One should also be mindful of the fact that Majority Rights is anti-Semitic, so the author’s concern here isn’t a white partition, it’s a gentile partition. That and s/he is paranoid about so-called “Jewish influence” within the parts of the racial and non-racial right s/he bashes by name, so his or her anti-Semitism is clouding his or her ability to interpret events, and therefore clouding his or her analysis of the situation, making things seem more hopeless to him or her than they actually are.
* Speechless.
* Just change the name from “racial profiling” to “predictive analysis,” and the good libs are all for it. I wish I would have thought of it.
* Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-GA): Another Leopard that is so easily trying to change its immigration spots. Well, je me souviens, and I’m “souvening” Isakson’s support for “comprehensive immigration reform” in 2007, both he and his Georgia stablemate in the person of Saxby Chambliss.
* Jefferson County: Full of meth labs and Democrats. (Yeah, I know, pick your poison). But, only two murders in the whole county for 2Q2010. Contrast to St. Louis City, where there can be two murders on the same street in one moment.
* But, to its credit, Jefferson County did vote Prop C at about the average for the statewide vote outside of STL and KC proper. Apparently, Juan Williams thinks it doesn’t count because some old white people got to vote. I guess the solution is obvious — Don’t let old white people vote.
Speaking of Fox News Sunday, I saw Ted Olson defending his anti-Prop 8 stance to Chris Wallace. Hey, Olson, can you come up with a few more words other than just “fundamental right,” “discrimination” and “interracial?”
* Summer of Sharia: Yay for this bunch, right?
Wrong. As Andy McCarthy has pointed out, extremist Muslims will drop terrorism if it gets too counter-productive. But remember, terrorism is just one tactic of many possible tactics — Sharia is the end game. So what may be going on at this summer camp is teaching campers how to infiltrate the political system in Britain through peaceful means, blurting out “tolerant” niceties to bamboozle all the stupid white liberals. (Not hard to do.) Then, once in power, bring down the Sharia hammer.
* Raptors vs Nets in London. Why does the NBA hate London so much?
* Tis life in the big city: Almost all of the teenagers in Boston who are required to go through anti-violence seminars for one reason or another are the furthest thing from violent or even criminal. Ironically, I bet you that a lot of the adults doleing out the anti-violence message are ex-cons who are professional tell-people-how-not-to-commit-crimers. I think something’s wrong with this picture…can’t quite put my finger on it…
* The ever-decreasing age of puberty in girls? The usual suspects, better nutrition, obesity, environmental toxins are being blamed. BUT…Official America does seem to be broaching The Great Taboo:
Dr. Catherine Gordon, a pediatric endocrinologist and specialist in adolescent medicine at Children’s Hospital Boston, said that so far, most evidence showed that neither breast development nor menstrual age had changed for white girls of normal weight.
The new study included 1,239 girls ages 6 to 8 who were recruited from schools and examined at one of three sites: the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in Manhattan, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital or Kaiser Permanente Northern California/University of California, San Francisco. The group was roughly 30 percent each white, black and Hispanic, and about 5 percent Asian.
At 7 years, 10.4 percent of white, 23.4 percent of black and 14.9 percent of Hispanic girls had enough breast development to be considered at the onset of puberty.
At age 8, the figures were 18.3 percent in whites, 42.9 percent in blacks and 30.9 percent in Hispanics. The percentages for blacks and whites were even higher than those found by a 1997 study that was one of the first to suggest that puberty was occurring earlier in girls.
Therefore, the obvious implication is that the decreasing average age of puberty onset in girls is almost entirely indicative of so many “American” girls being black and Hispanic.
Someone call Morris Dees, and tell him to add Children’s Boston to his official rock-em sock-em mega-list of hate groups.
