“Burn Allah Burn” canceled.
The main reason why it was canceled was because something happened that I predicted would happen — After Obama sacked Gen. McChrystal and forced Gen. David Petraeus into making the lateral move from Iraq to Afg, Afghanistan is now Obama’s baby 100% in terms of the political fallout from failure. Petraeus wanted the Koran burning stopped, and Obama will deny Petraeus nothing. So Petraeus called Obama, Obama called Holder, Holder called the FBI, and the FBI paid Pastor Jones a visit at his Gainesville, Florida church. And by “paid a visit,” I mean make some implicit threats, (The MSM confirmed that FBI agents told Jones they’d write down license plate numbers of cars parked in the church’s parking lot at the Koran burning event), with perhaps some carrots at the end of the sticks. (I predict that Jones will sue the Feds for civil rights violations, for a very large monetary amount, and the FBI/Solicitor General will “surprisingly” concede liability or mount only a token defense, and/or the two sides will settle out of court, also for a large amount of money.) One of those carrots is NOT moving the G0M — The Imam behind that has denied vehemently that there was any deal in that regard.
Now, am I happy the FBI did this the way it did it? No. Am I relieved that some level of government did something to shut this down? Yes, in spite of my libertarian propensities and my better judgment. While I know perfectly well that OBL/AQ/Taliban can recruit based on any flimsy pretense, burning Korans was just a bridge too far. A country boy might say that half a bag of rattlesnakes is still a bag of rattlesnakes, but in this case, I don’t agree — The reason I wanted Jones’s event shut down is because, in this instance, a whole bag of rattlesnakes can poison you twice as fast as half a bag of rattlesnakes. What I mean by this is that while AQ/Taliban will kill our soldiers in Afg in ghastly ways no matter what, they’ll do it even more quickly and even more brutally if the Koran burning happens. The FBI just saved the lives of some number of American troops in Afg.
The Dove World Outreach Center’s website is now down, but when it was up, I took a look around, and this church supports every long-term foreign occupation and reconstruction of Muslim lands that any good neo-con can dream up. It’s just a truth of life, in every human civilization in the annals of recorded history — Warfare erodes civil liberties, at least while the war is going on, and often long after the war is over. This is why whatever military effort we engage in overseas should be, or should have been, as short as possible, and involve as little on-the-ground occupation as possible, and only be used for the purposes of punishment and retribution, not for ideological reconstruction of the Natan Sharansky ideal. Our men and women being in Afghanistan two days short of forever to convert a country whose people obviously unsuited for life in a democratic republic into a democratc republic is something Pastor Terry Jones advocates. It should be no surprise that civil liberties in his own country, including his own personal civil liberties, are negatively impacted by the war and occupation he wants. As far as I’m concerned, he and his church hoisted themselves on their own petard.
I feel sort of weird having this opinion, because it not only goes against my libertarian instincts, but this opinion is also contradictory to my opinion over two similar issues: (1) Salman Rushdie, and (2) The Mohammed Cartoons. To be consistent (which, as you know, I don’t give a shit about “consistency” outside of mathematical, logical, scientific, legal/contractual, etc.), I’d have to say that Rushdie and the Cartoonists deserve what happened to him or will happen to them, respectively. In fact, as you know from being a regular reader, PJB and myself were on opposite sides of the second issue. So why am I not sensitive to Muslim “sensibilities” when it comes to those two things, but all of a sudden sensitive re burning Korans? Here’s the answer: Note the back-and-forth between a poster named “Derrick Rasmussen” and myself (“Question Diversity.”) Mr. Rasmussen pointed out that there is a difference between mocking and blatant disrespect. In that conversation, note the question I raised there that I also raised here a few days ago: How did news of this rinky-dink 50-member church burning Korans become news on the other side of the world before it became news in this country? It had to be news there before it was news here, because Muslims already protested and rioted in a lot of Muslim cities and countries. I would not be surprised to find out that this “Dove” church wasn’t for real, that it was ultimately an AQ front; AQ wanted them to burn Korans to solidify Muslim opposition to the U.S. and Muslim support for the G0M.
There is a local angle to this controversy.
KMOX radio:
Religious leaders in St. Louis plan to gather Thursday morning to call on St. Louisans to condemn the planned burning of the Quran by a Florida minister.
The Reverend Terry Jones plans to burn the Muslim holy book on September 11th.
State Representative Jamilah Nasheed will be among those opposing the action.
“I thinks he’s (Jones) is just seeking attention and I think it’s the wrong way to seek attention. This will ignite a lot of tension among Christians and Muslims” said Nasheed.
Representative Nasheed is the only Muslim in the Missouri legislature.
She calls Islam a beautiful religion that has nothing to do with terrorism. The call for support will take place at the Muhammad Mosque on West Florissant Avenue.
For the record, Miss Nasheed is a black woman, i.e. native born African-American. From what I understand, she converted to Islam as a young adult, so she took the black American NOI-style track to Islam; she wasn’t born into an Islamic household. Though she still has a lot to learn if she thinks that Islam “has nothing to do with terrorism.”
UPDATE 11 PM: PJB chimes in. He asks:
Yet if, as President Obama and his commanding general both say, the torching of hundreds of Qurans could so enrage the Islamic world as to incite terror-bombings against U.S. troops and imperial our war effort, why does not the commander in chief send U.S. marshals to arrest this provocateur and abort his provocation?
(snip)
And if Petraeus says letting Jones set this bonfire could imperil U.S. troops, Obama should act to stop it. And if he is so paralyzed by uncertainty as to whether he can do anything — and, as a result, soldiers die — what would that tell us about their commander in chief?
Would stopping Jones and confiscating the Qurans violate Jones’ First Amendment rights? Perhaps. And perhaps not. But if Eric Holder cannot find a charge against Davis, or an inherent power of a war president to prevent actions imminently damaging to the war effort, Obama should find some Justice Department attorneys who can.
Let the ACLU make the case that interfering with Davis’ bonfire violates his First Amendment rights. Let a U.S. court decide whether Obama has the power to take a decision previous wartime presidents would have taken without hesitation.
And if Obama does not have the power to stop actions like this, imperiling our troops, then we should get out of this war.
I think this was written earlier today, before Paster Jones canceled. My response to this column is that I think Obama did act to stop it, but to keep a lid on the controversy, he’ll never admit he sent the FBI in to harass and threaten Jones. And, if like I think, there is some sort of carrot-stick deal between Jones and the FBI/Feds/Obama, Jones will never admit that there was harassment.
UPDATE 11:30 PM: Whoa boy. Terry Jones, Cape Central H.S. ’69. Along with…Rush Limbaugh. Wait’ll the libs get wind of this…
UPDATE 9/13: Speaking of Salman Rushdie, speaking of someone that should know better, he has come out for the G0M, and against Pastor Jones for the wrong reason.