NCAA Opens Investigations For Rules Violations

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind.  (FNN)  –  The National Collegiate Athletics Association has opened an investigation of every one of its 1,281 schools, leagues and associations which comprise its membership.

Mark A. Emmert, current President of the NCAA, announced the mass investigation at a press conference today at the NCAA’s Indianapolis headquarters.

“From information we have received, cheating and rules violations are so rampant and seemingly so widespread that we had no choice but to investigate everyone,” Emmert said.  “We need to find out who isn’t cheating.  We’ve got to catch them pale-handed.”

Emmert announced the formation of a blue ribbon panel, headed by former NCAA President Myles Brand, one that both men hoped would cast such a wide dragnet that it would fail to catch all the clean programs.  “If you’re following the rules, make no mistake about it — You can hide, but you can’t run.  We will find you, and expose your rectitude for the whole world to see.  We’ll know whose hands aren’t in the cookie jar.”

Any school that is caught following all the rules faces a possible punishment of having a horrible athletic program for the next ten years.

Not in the SPLC Literature

Just like the Hutaree, only (A) Much darker, (B) Actually killed a cop, and (C) In the name of pro-black left-wing extremism.  If Mr. Shepard ever ran around naked in a field with a cutout picture of George W. Bush covering his dick, requesting that a mascot duck not molest him with his dildo mallet, then the comparison would come full circle.

It was reported in other sources that Mr. Shepard said that he wanted to kill cops “because the ballot box isn’t working.”  And by “working,” he meant to neuter cops in the face of black crime.

WTF does he mean by the “ballot box not working?”  Lyndon Johnson won 61% of the popular vote, the highest of any candidate in a genuinely contested Presidential election in American history, and then rode that mandate into signing every anti-police civil rights bill that neutered the cops that came to his desk.  Barack Obama won 365 electoral votes and then said that the Cambridge, Mass. P.D. Sergeant “acted stupidly” because he dared to arrest a belligerent black man who was in the middle of a publicity stunt.  (Yeah, I’m still riding that horse.)  And, as it sadly turns out, the Republicans in Jefferson City are going to give the SLPD back to the city so that the whackjobs who constitute city government can put in a civilian review board which will even further handcuff white cops in the face of black crime.  Seems like the ballot box IS working, and all you have to do is vote Republocrat.

UPDATE 3/3: The guilty verdict was handed down today.  Mr. Shepard took the stand and admitted that he killed the cop (who turned out to be white) because he wanted to kill a white cop.  No link to the story because it mentions the name of the presiding judge.  I do find it ironic that Bob McCulloch personally prosecuted this case.  Not surprising, because McCulloch’s father was a cop that was murdered in the line of duty.  But ironic, because McCulloch was a Truth Squader.

UPDATE 3/4: Sentencing hearing began today.  Money quote from the P-D article about it, relating to Shepard’s taking the stand in the sentencing portion of the hearing, no link because it mentions the judge:

On the witness stand, Shepard said he became agitated at home in Berkeley the morning of Oct. 31, 2008, because he saw then-presidential candidate Barack Obama on TV, saying in an answer to a question that he would not seek an endorsement from the controversial National of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan.

Shepard said it made him mad enough to tear up his voter registration card and flush it down the toilet. McCulloch asked how, as a convicted felon, he could have been registered to vote. Shepard insisted that he was.

Shepard said he had lunch at a Red Lobster restaurant, where a waitress wore a name tag that said “Truth,” and he heard her talk to others about being revolutionary. He said it reminded him of how activist Malcolm X used to talk about people who used the term loosely.

On an errand later to buy drugs, Shepard said, he drove through “enemy territory” in University City on a “reconnaissance mission” to look for police, as he had done dozens of times before.

He said he noticed a white male officer — not King — walking a beat on Delmar Boulevard. “I remember saying to myself that would be a good way to start a revolution there, by knocking a patch off the back of his head.” But he said he kept going because he could not find a parking place.

He said he passed up shooting a female officer in a patrol car because she was black. He described seeing King, parked on Leland Avenue, as “like a vision or something.”

MO allows convicted felons to vote if they’re out of prison and their probation is complete.  Aside from most of the local media vastly downplaying the black-on-white race hate of this matter, if his probation wasn’t finished and he was allowed to register to vote, that ought to be the other element of scandal coming out of this.

UPDATE 3/6: The jury returned a guilty verdict very quickly.  That’s how I knew he wouldn’t get the death penalty.  When the trial began, the P-D reported there were two blacks on the jury, and the way these things sometimes work out when the murder defendant is black is that the black jurors intimidate the white jurors that they’ll refuse to convict if the white jurors seriously consider the death penalty.  Now, what happened here is that we know for sure that one juror objected to the death penalty, hanging up the jurors in the penalty phase, therefore defaulting to a life sentence.  We don’t or probably will never know if this one juror was one of the two blacks.

Also, the P-D defends its printing Shepard’s actual vulgarities (“punk ass fag”) toward McCulloch, instead of stating that the now-convicted murder used vulgarities against the Circuit Attorney who prosecuted him.  Really, someone who is about to go away to prison for the rest of his life ought not be boasting about his own future career.

Reading Material:  P-D, KSDK

Related:  Hutaree

Straw Dog

Daily Mail:

Half of Britain ‘would vote for far-Right parties if they gave up violence’

Almost half the country would back a far-Right party if they gave up violence, an astonishing new poll revealed today.

A total of 48 per cent said that they would support a group that vowed to crack down on immigration and Islamic extremists.

(snip)

There has been a recent wave of support for extremists such as the English Defence League and the British National Party.

The poll was commissioned by a consortium, the major part of which was the notorious far-left British organization and publication called Searchlight.

First off, this is a straw dog.  “If” they gave up violence?  They don’t believe in violence or advocate violence, neither the EDL or the BNP.  And it should be noted that the EDL is an activist organization, not a political party.  The EDL and BNP have mixed relations with each other, varying between hot and cold, mostly cold.  The main reason the EDL won’t embrace the BNP completely is because the EDL is pro-Israel and still thinks that the current BNP is the BNP of the Tyndall era.  When in reality, today’s BNP is neutral on Israel, neutral on Jews in general, and currently has a Jewish member elected to a municipal public office (city council-like) in England.  The point is, now we know why the far left combined with the Tory-shill media are peddling the false narrative, evidence by the title of the Mail article and the Telegraph article, that the BNP and EDL do support violence, or “are associated” with violence.

The Telegraph version then says that:

Huge numbers of Britons would support an anti-immigration English nationalist party if it was not associated with violence and fascist imagery, according to the largest survey into identity and extremism conducted in the UK.

“Not associated with violence and fascist imagery.”  That’s different from advocating violence or engaging in violence.  The only reason the BNP and EDL are “associated with violence” is because every time they go out in public and do something, the black-clad face-concealed far-left goons, with Searchlight’s countenance, tries to beat them up.  And far from “fascist imagery,” like I said above, the EDL is pro-Israel, and the BNP under Nick Griffin is neutral.  And both forever laud Britain’s part in winning the war against Hitler.  If the EDL and BNP are “associated” with “fascist imagery,” it is thanks to the selfsame leftist goons.

However, if Searchlight doesn’t have an ulterior motive for pumping up the percentage of Britons that would vote for a “clean” nationalist party (fundraising, etc.), and assuming that 48% would vote for such a party, this is big news.  Remember, in 2005, Tony Blair remained PM and his Labour Party retained an absolute majority in Parliament even though Labour only got 35.2% of the popular vote.  Last year, David Cameron became PM, even in a divided government situation with the Learning Disableds, while the Tories flipped a net of 97 seats, their biggest one-night gain ever, even though the Tories only got 36.1% of the popular vote.  On the other end, the 1997 landslide which brought Tony Blair to power and his Labour Party flipping 145 seats was on the backs of 43.2% of the vote.  A BNP getting 48% is like an ultra-landslide under a FPTP system.

Don’t forget, Nick Griffin is stepping down in 2013.  The process to choose his successor as BNP leader will probably be a few months before his retirement.  All I can say is that that process will be crucial, and they better not fuck it up.  NickG has brought the party to the vestibule of credibility, and the right successor could take it even further.  For if Searchlight is right, the iron is very hot and prime for striking.  Even if they’re inflating the stats for fundraising purposes, e.g. it’s only half that, a BNP getting 24% of the vote would still give a it a whole bunch of Parliament seats AND king-making ability under the right circumstances.

 

I Hope the Tampa Bay Rays Lose 100 Games This Season

And every other season that Joe Maddon is their manager.

St. Petersburg Times:

Tampa Bay Rays manager Joe Maddon on a mission to help growing Hispanic population integrate into hometown of Hazleton, Pa.

PORT CHARLOTTE — Manager Joe Maddon has a new cause.

Having worked extensively to help the homeless in the Tampa Bay area through his Thanksmas charity program, Maddon has now set his sights on his hometown of Hazleton, Pa.

In short, he wants to help integrate the growing Hispanic population (in excess of 10,000) into a seemingly reluctant old-school community to help keep the whole city from dying.

After meeting with Hispanic families during his holiday visit home, Maddon said he realized the Dominicans and Puerto Ricans and other Hispanics there now are following the same path the European immigrants, including his own family, did generations ago but are not being welcomed.

So it takes Dominicans and Puerto Ricans to keep a crusty old white city from dying.  If that’s the case, why aren’t both the Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico great?  Why won’t Puerto Rico declare its independence from the imperialist rule of those crusty old white Americans and turn into an international superpower on par with the Dominican Republic?  (At the very least, quit relying on that crusty old schooler white American welfare.)  Why do Dominicans and Puerto Ricans have to go anywhere at all if they’re so great?  They can be great right where they are and not share their greatness with us crusty old gringoes.

More questions:  If the “old schooler” whites back in Hazleton thought all those PRs and DRs were revitalizing the city, why did the Mayor who wanted them out of the city, one Lou Barletta, win both the Republican and Democrat Party primaries for Mayor when he ran for his third term?  (He’s a Republican, and he won the Democrat primary with write-in votes from white Democrats, beating an ex-Mayor in the process.  Barletta did not declare himself a write-in candidate for the Democrat nomination because he was already a ballot candidate for the Republican nomination.  It was the city’s white Democrats who took it on themselves to write his name in.)  If the people in Hazleton’s Congressional district thought all these Hispanics could bring back all these “old schooler” white towns in PA-11, why did they almost turn out their deep-rooted Democrat incumbent (Paul Kanjorski) in 2008 for the aforementioned Mr. Barletta, in spite of Obama carrying the district with a 15-point margin?  And why did they finally do it two years later?

Joe Maddon should stick to managing baseball.