Your Blogmeister’s Desk
I just posted this comment at Angry White Dude:
Everyone is saying that HRC as the Democrat nominee in 2016 is inevitable. But HRC as the Democrat nominee in 2008 was also supposed to be inevitable. Yet, she didn’t win, someone came out of left field to take what was inevitably hers from her. Other than Obama being both black and “not too black” at the same time, I think there’s some unspoken undiscussed and maybe taboo reason/X-Factor that HRC couldn’t win the nomination in 2008, that I think is going to show its head again in 2016. Maybe it has something to do with gender sociology of some sort, maybe it has something to do with Democrat voters not taking kindly to her entitlement attitude, maybe it has something to do that unlike the Republican Party on the Presidential level, the Democrat Party on the Presidential level has been more conducive to people “coming out of left field” to win the nomination, or maybe it’s a factor nobody really knows anything about.
As far as 2016 Democrats, watch out for Mark Warner.
One more thing: The only kind of Republican that can win the Presidency from here on out is one that makes immigration patriotism (opposition to amnesty and open borders) a centerpiece of his or her campaign. If the Republicans nominate an open borders type or a squishy no-opinion-on-the-issue type in 2016 and later, that will only guarantee the election of whoever the Democrat is.
By “gender sociology” wrecking HRC’s candidacy, I mean either the female crabs in a bucket syndrome (women having the catty hen house dislike of another woman and therefore not wanting to see the other woman get ahead), queen bee syndrome (powerful women who prevent other potentially powerful women from accumulating too much power, evidenced in 2007-8 by all the white women elected politicians who endorsed Obama over HRC early), the polar opposite of queen bee syndrome (semi-powerful political women didn’t want to see a woman President because they subconsciously knew she would start acting queen bee and that would be the end of their own advancement — To wit: A President Hillary Clinton would appoint as few women as possible to Cabinet level and other important executive positions), or maybe Rush’s theory that nobody wanted to watch an already upper middle aged woman grow old quickly in the public eye (the Presidency is a job that ages you in a hurry), and the “old” look looks more authoritative and power-indicative on men than it does on women, or maybe that there is really a glass ceiling underneath the Oval Office (people, both men and women, don’t want to put a woman in command of the world’s most powerful military — My own mother has said as much, that there should be no woman President as long as our military is that powerful), or maybe there are other factors I can’t even fathom.
The reason I’m all of a sudden saying watch out for Mark Warner to come out of left field is that Andrew Cuomo is too creepy, Biden’s a non-starter because his two previous Presidential campaigns, 1988 and 2008, were also non-starters, and he’s too much of a doofus/spaz, and of course, like I said, HRC’s failure to launch in 2008 for whatever reason will re-present in 2016, and that leaves Warner.
Discuss.

