The CofCC National Blog had a story a few days ago about a study in Occidental Quarterly, the conclusion of which is that, as a generality, whites will speak as if they believe in racial equality, but behave like they do not. The widest disparity between talking the talk and walking the walk is among white self-professed liberals.
This white liberal hypocrisy also extends to the area of professional athletics.
If you follow the NBA at least minimally, then you know that Kevin Garnett was traded from the Minnesota Timberwolves, the franchise that drafted him in 1995 and with his he has played the entirety of his professional career until now, to the Boston Celtics. Mr. Garnett was drafted in 1995, and was the first man in decades to be drafted straight out of high school into the professional ranks. His bypassing college started a wave of high school players entering the NBA draft and skipping college, that lasted from 1995 to 2003. After the 2003 draft, the NBA changed the rules and mandated that those drafted into the NBA or signed by teams had to be at least one year in time separated from the graduation of their high school class, i.e. essentially mandating one year of college.
During those years, there was a lot of complaining and consternation by media pundits and sports journalists, and by some NBA league executives (which is why the rules were changed a few years ago). Their worry was the those players skipping college wouldn’t have a post-secondary education to fall back onto if their pro career went bust (which happens often).
In response, a lot of blacks were complaining that whites who said that were being racist, as the NBA drafted European whites who were often 18 or 19 years old, and nobody was worried that they wouldn’t have a college education to “fall back onto.” Also, in many other sports, a lot of young people turn pro early in life, and don’t attend college, and don’t play college athletics, and certainly didn’t think they needed college sports as a stepping stone to a pro career, or a college education to “fall back onto.” (Remember, Tiger Woods, who will probably be a billionaire by the time the best years of his golf career is over, left Stanford after his sophomore year to turn pro.) Therefore, many blacks were asking, why was this “concern” by the white media seemed only to be aimed at black basketball players.
You will notice, especially if you have read this blog for some time, that every early January and mid-March, like clockwork, the mainstream news and sports media will carry a story about how big-time college coaches and programs in football (in January, during college football championships) and men’s basketball (in mid-March, during tourney time) aren’t doing a good enough job “graduating” their players. I have already stated why that reasoning is half-baked.
But if the blacks who think that the white liberals in the news and sports media are being “racist” in their criticism, they’re off-base. What I think is going on is that the latter are patronizing black athletes. Nevertheless, to say that colleges aren’t doing well enough in “graduating” their football and men’s basketball players, as if the mostly black student-athletes in those sports and no other sports have to be followed around and babied as if they were still adolescents, is not indicative of someone who truly believes that the races are equal. Likewise, to fret about how that 18-year old black man who was just drafted into the NBA mere weeks after his high school graduation won’t have “anything to fall back onto” because he skipped the underwater basket-weaving that serves as the curriculum of college courses patronized by most black college football and basketball players, while not saying the same about a white 16-year old teenage girl from Austria that starts winning major pro tennis tournaments like they were going out of style, is not also something that a genuine egalitarian would say.
It’s not just athletics, either. There are scores of actors, singers, and performing artists who didn’t attend college much if at all. The winner of American Idol this past season, 17-year old Jordin Sparks, has already started her professional singing career. So far, I have not heard any pompous talking heads in the mainstream news media or entertainment media complain that Miss Sparks won’t have a college sheepskin “to fall back onto” should her singing career go bust (which I think it will). Kelly Clarkson won the first Idol as a 20-year old, and likewise, there was nothing said in this stead in August 2002, either.
Sometimes, even those athletes who have college degrees do not have jobs that suggest that they do. After the Rams won the Super Bowl in January 2000, after the 1999 season, everyone in St. Louis heard the Kurt Warner rags-to-riches story a thousand times. He played college ball at the University of Northern Iowa, and used all four years of his eligibility, and graduated from UNI. Even after college, he wasn’t good enough to be drafted by or signed by an NFL team, so for a year, he was a shelf-stocker at a Hy-Vee Supermarket in Cedar Falls, Iowa. A year after college, he was signed by the Arena League team in Des Moines, and he parlayed that to NFL Europe, then the Rams, then Trent Green got injured in the ‘99 preseason, propelling Warner into the top of the QB depth chart, the rest is history. The point here is that for the year between college and NFL Europe, even with a UNI sheepskin, i.e. a college education “to fall back onto,” the best job he could “fall onto” was something that could be done by an exceptionally bright chimpanzee. So that NBA bust that ends up stocking store shelves for a living would be doing just that with or without a college diploma.
In other words, this is another example of this OQ research cited above, that white liberals talk equality but often advocate as if they were racial supremacists, or at least racial patronizers.
In my mind, and notwithstanding some other concerns, if you’re good enough at 18 to play professional basketball, i.e. some team is willing to draft you, then you’re no less likely to be a bust if you play college basketball for four years.
The reason my mind is running in this direction today is this story: The world’s most lucrative and most-followed professional sports franchise, the Manchester (England) United soccer team, has signed a NINE-year old boy, and according to the article, they sign several dozen boys of his age every year. Of course, they’re not playing for the team itself, and are farmed into developmental leagues and academies, and very likely do attend either public schools in Manchester or receive private tutoring, funded by the team. Still, nine is a bridge too far, in my opinion. And I’m not reading any media pundits complaining about how the soccer training is distracting from the education of 9-year old boys.