What Ann Coulter got while it was still embargoed is now available for everyone.
It’s mostly stuff I knew as a matter of either fact or common sense.
Here’s the problem with it:
The fundamental assumption in the minds of those who wrote it, (and since Phyllis Schlafly is almost 90, though a really cogent and on-the-ball 90, she probably had a lot of help in writing this), is that the most important things in human civilization are conservative American hobby horse issues. Now, in terms of the political battle conditions on the ground, that’s a feature, not a bug, because it’s written with the assumption that elected Republicans and grass roots conservatives will read it, and the purpose of the document in light of that is begging both groups not to let RINO mendacity and Roverrated/Zuckerbutt deceitful media buys targeted at them fool them into signing on to their own suicide.
However, that’s not my chief concern. I’m concerned with it for the negative effects it will have on white people, especially non-rich white people. I would have liked to have seen Phyllis Schlafly write something more like Jared Taylor would write. But we know that will never happen. To me, worrying about which ideologies are helped or harmed by mass non-white uncontrolled immigration is as silly as worrying about which vegetables will be consumed more or less as a result of it. Don’t forget, even among white people, ideologies have come and gone, and will always come and go. But race is forever; if we lose the white race, we lose everything and forever.
However, the hard cold current political reality is that amnesty and open borders, which is bad for white people qua white people, is only going to get stopped here in the mid-2010s time frame if lamer cons and hobby horse cons don’t buckle. Sure, the liberal analogue to Phyllis Schlafly could write a very similar report that amnesty and open borders hurts leftist hobby horse issues, except such a report will fall on blind eyes and deaf ears, because the sine qua non of the political left today is being against and hating white people, aka sniffing the KKKrazy Glue. The hobby horse left is fully on board with wiping out the borders, because they presume that the new Democrat voters will help them in their quest to implement their hobby horse leftist issues. And temporarily, they would be right. Just not in the long run.
Two slight knit picks I have with the the report from a factual basis.
While it states that (white) legal European immigrants are just as liberal as non-white legal immigrants, that’s like worrying about causing a flood on the floor of the desert with an eye dropper full of water dripping out one drop at a time. There are hardly any legal white European immigrants anyway.
About Asians — It may not be that changing kinds of Asian immigration has changed their voting habits from Republican in the 1980s to Democrat today. Asian-Americans, especially East Asian-Americans, almost always take their political and voting cues from people that surround them. What this means is that they don’t actually move the political needle, they just watch which way that other forces are moving it and then eke it along in that same direction a little bit. If Asians voted Republican in the ’80s, it means that they were surrounded by Republicans, and if they vote Democrat today, it means that they’re now surrounded by Democrats. Other factors caused the political constitution of the people that surround Asians to change, but Asians did not cause those things.
You can see that dynamic at work here in St. Louis. Asians in the city vote Democrat, Asians in Chesterfield vote Republican.
That said, I think the reason that so many of today’s Asians are on the left side of the hobby horse conservative issues, according to polls, is because they’re surrounded by people who have those opinions, not because they have those opinions themselves.