I’m Supposed to Care?

3 12 2013

Atlanta

CNS:

CDC: 62% of Men Who Know They’re HIV Positive Have Unprotected Sex With Men

Sixty-two percent of American men who know they are HIV positive continue to have unprotected anal sex, according to data released last week by the federal Centers for Disease Control.

This data, which was published Friday, came from the federal government’s National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System.

The percentage of self-aware HIV-positive men who engage in unprotected anal sex has been increasing, according to the CDC. In 2005, 55 percent did so. In 2008, 57 percent did so. And, in 2011, 62 percent did so.

Sorry, my Care-o-Meter 2014 (yes, the new model year is out) isn’t budging above zero.

By now, everyone who is not blatantly mentally retarded that male homosexual sex without condoms is the big HIV-spreading vector, and it’s not as if condoms are hard to get these days.  If they don’t care, why should I?

Advertisements

Actions

Information

9 responses

3 12 2013
Hard Right

Some of those douchebags also have sex with women.

Think about that the next time you go on a date.

3 12 2013
countenance

Yep, I’ve heard of condoms myself.

Even used quite a few in my day.

3 12 2013
radicaldesi

We should care because we will be paying their medical bills.

3 12 2013
countenance

Point taken.

But what am I supposed to do about it? What are we supposed to do about it?

You can forget about the re-criminalization of male homosexual sex.

Commission an STD police to intervene before the start of any gay sex and force the “pitcher” to wrap it up?

3 12 2013
radicaldesi

You are right. We can do nothing.

If all the millions spent on AIDS “education” has not convinced the majority of gay men to behave responsibly, nothing will.

3 12 2013
Hard Right

Quarantine them. We wouldn’t have an AIDS problem if the Government had done that back in the 80’s.

3 12 2013
countenance

Even as implausible as that sounds now, it has a better chance of happening than anything else I just said.

4 12 2013
M&S

Figure out what drives the rise of homosexuality in every age of enlightenment. Make changes in prenatal or childhood or pubescent hormonal scheduling to inhibit or alter brain chemistry so that homosexual intent does not develop through whatever threshold event sets the behavior.

The ‘evolved’ view is that homosexuality is a consequence of some women with heightened fertility influencing some male zygotes in a way that is prenatally impossible to prevent.

Yet in a working society of hetero men, such children would be rapidly destroyed or disenfranchised as a function denying any indulgence of developmental predilections in a manner that would expand their population.

So. Something social is happening that makes the rise of homosexuality (Greece, Sparta, Rome) more prevalent.

Find it. Kill it.

My first suggestions would be:

1. Fluoride.
2. Soy Products.
3. SGH in meat and poultry.
4. Plastic which behaves like Estrogen.
5. Social Manipulation Which Requires Men To Act Submissive to other
Races and Women.
6. Lack of a male led household as psychological imprint to reinforce the
advantages of _being a guy_.

Not necessarily in that order.

I would suggest that, since we need much higher operative IQs and an easy way to get there without massive genomic modifications is simply to amp up the fetus’ exposure to critical hormones and growth proteins in select developmental regimes (them folic acids doctors are always telling pregnant women about), we might also consider investment in exogenics.

Women don’t want to invest in children which destroy their sexual attractiveness as a weapon or negotiating tool in the workplace or life as a 3+8 = 11 years commitment to generating replacement level populations.

Men don’t want to be life-raped of half their worldly goods and salaries by women in divorce court for the privilege of never seeing their kids again because ‘women aren’t satisfied’ (yes, not rape, not infidelity, not even incompatible differences, just ennui is now the #1 cause of female initiated divorce which outnumbers male initiated ones almost 4:1).

So take the social leveraging out of the equation.

Order your kid like a pizza and take a simple trip to the doctor’s office to make it happen. Accept that 3 out of 5 of those fertilized embryos you get a woman to donate will likely die due to the effects of hormonal acceleration (vs. 1 of 1 on the mother if we did it in-utero) and create a better, smarter, human population whose success would ensure your old age and your people’s position in the global society.

‘And while you’re at it…’ Make sure that guys are guys and girls are…whatever seems to please them this year.

Since loss in fertility (America is now at 1.83:1 in terms of non-hispanic/mulatto/SWA _white_ reproduction) is the ultimate penalty inherent to the disease of homosexuality, it is also the one consequence to it we should be most interested in compensating for.

5 12 2013
Nothing we can do | radicaldesi

[…] I’m Supposed to Care? (Countenance Blog) […]




%d bloggers like this: