Everything Old Is Still Old

16 02 2014

Bowling Green, Kentucky

“Republicans haven’t gone to African-Americans or to Hispanics and said, ‘You know what? The war on drugs, Big Government, has had a racial outcome. It’s disproportionately affected the poor and the black and the brown,’” he said, on TheBlaze.

This has never been tried before.

Unless it has.

Two words: Jack Kemp.

Who averaged a BIG BIG BIG whopping 5% of the vote in Republican primaries and caucuses he actually tried to do well in when he ran for President in 1988. And when he was the Vice-Presidential nominee in 1996, he let wooden AL GORE of all people get the better of him in a debate.  Kemp’s being on the bottom of the ticket that year probably didn’t get as much as one single black or Hispanic voter to change their vote from Clinton to Dole.  And that was the first real chance that black and other non-white voters had to show their appreciation to Kemp for all of his years of pandering to them, as the only kind of elections he ever ran in before were in his own western NYS Republican-gerrymandered Congressional district, which hardly had any blacks or Hispanics, or in Republican Presidential primaries and caucuses in 1988, which blacks patronized about as well as they do bookstores.  (In 1988, Jesse Jackson was a semi-credible contender on the Democrat side during their primary and caucus season, so black voters had an obvious skin interest there.)  Yet, the kind of people Kemp so dearly cared about because they were all in one big jock shower together (his own words) strangely wanted nothing to do with him.

Now, back to Jack Kemp 2.0.

Rand Paul’s 2016 keynote issues?

* Allow felons to vote (*)
* Quasi-legalization of drugs
* Oppose the NON-ISSUE (**) of the use of armed drones on American territory
* Give tax breaks to non-taxpaying minorities
* And most of all, swing the borders wide open and give work permits to anyone on Earth who wants to come here and work, turning us all into wage slaves, well, all of us except for the top 1% of the top 1%.

Wow, there’s the path to victory.

No, there’s the path to LOSING, which is the opposite of WINNING. Which is why he’s getting more and more favorable coverage from the liberal media, save the WaPo, and the only reason they’re not on board is because they need to sell subscriptions in a city full of people that either work for the NSA or people that are related to or are friends with people that work for the NSA.

Nominate Rand Paul, LOSE.

Nominate Jeff Sessions, WIN.

(*) – Kentucky is one of the few states that have an almost absolute blanket prohibition on convicted felons voting.  Which would come in handy if you’re running for Senate from the state of Kentucky in a close contest, wouldn’t it, Rand?

(**) – Note to peanut gallery:  The Posse Comitatus Act of 1871 already makes illegal the use of armed drones on regular American territory.  We won that battle 143 years ago.  No need to re-fight it.


Actions

Information

4 responses

16 02 2014
Cheerful Hamster

I can picture it now – some black Dem candidate bashing Rand for wanting drug legalization. “Drugs have devastated our communities, and he wants to legalize them!”

I’ve been watching a few libertarian talks on Youtube, stuff like Stefan Molyneaux and various men’s rights activists. For every ounce of insight they have a pound of stupidity; they can pick apart leftist economics with ease, but swallow whole the cultural Marxist agenda on race.

16 02 2014
countenance

In a way, it has already started. This one is hardly want you call a typical black Dem political candidate, though:

http://capblackhood.blogspot.com/2014/02/liberals-liberal-tarians-soft-on-black.html

Black pols not so long ago wanted the harsh prison bits for crack slingers b/c of “the damage it causes to black communities.” Then they flipped and wanted them undone because “it puts so many black men in prison.” So it would not be beyond them to flip again if it’s a matter of some Democrat versus Rand Paul in an election.

But I think that’s entirely hypothetical. Rand Paul won’t win as much as one Republican primary or caucus for President in 2016.

16 02 2014
Puggg

I’m glad I wasn’t paying attention to politics during Jack Kemp’s political career.

17 02 2014
SoCal Patriot

@ Countenance,

“…Rand Paul won’t win as much as one Republican primary or caucus for President in 2016.”

I hope to God you’re right.

It's your dime, spill it. And also...NO TROLLS ALLOWED~!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.




%d bloggers like this: