Easier Than That

26 10 2016

Tucson

Biological proof that Patient Zero wasn’t patient zero.

I already knew that, and I didn’t even need to run an evolutionary biology lab at a major university.

How did I know it?

Two words that very literate St. Louisans know:

Robert Rayford.

Since he died in May 1969, and now it is known he started showing symptoms as early as 1966, and it wasn’t until 1987 that it was proven that AIDS complications did him in, it means that the hypotheses in this article need to be questioned, because they are all after 1966.  Since he had never left St. Louis, especially not for the big cities full of gays which we’re supposed to think was the big vector transmitters in the next decade, this means that AIDS existed in the black ghettos of St. Louis no later than 1966 and probably earlier.

The commonly accepted official theory is that the pathogen made the jump from chimpanzees to humans in the early 20th century, but then we’re also told that before AIDS spread to the United States, it was already present in black Africans and black Caribbeans.  The problem is this:  How would it have been transmitted from black Africans to black Caribbeans in the early 20th century?  I am not aware of any significant population movement between black Africa and the black Caribbean in the early 20th century, either one group or the other going one or both ways, or some other group of people going back and forth between the two places.  Are we to think that there were enough gay white men from the United States going back and forth between the Congo and Haiti to have sex with men?  Did Congolese gay men go to Haiti to have sex with Haitian men in the 1920s?  Did Haitian men go to the Congo to have sex with Congolese men in the 1920s?  Crazy, yes, but that’s what we have to believe in order to believe the official story about when and how this pathogen spread from chimps to humans and then among humans.

Try this on for size:  Negro peoples already had AIDS when they were taken as slaves from west Africa and transported to wherever in the New World.  That’s the only sensible explanation for blacks in both Africa and the Caribbean having AIDS at the times in the 20th century when it has been proven that both groups were so infected.  It also means the (documented*) SIV to HIV jump happened at least centuries ago, not one century ago.  The only open question is the precise mechanics of the SIV to HIV jump.  Was it a matter of chimps biting humans, or humans eating chimp meat?  Or was it something a little more taboo?

* – What I mean by that is that we know for sure that humans of some sort first got the disease from chimps.  The reason I state that is because there’s a fashionable theory among some of us that the UN cooked up AIDS in a lab for the purposes of population control (either general population control or black population control, depends on who is telling you the theory).  Of course, that “effort” has obviously been so successful.


Actions

Information

18 responses

26 10 2016
Joshua Sinistar

Yeah man, that’s an interesting story, but I have to tell you there is an organization from the USA that is the vector nobody wants to talk about. The 1960s is when JFK the big lefty hero started the Peace Corps. They went specifically to black infestations to “help”. A lot of the volunteers were fags looking for dark meat fantasies, and those monkey viruses traveled around in Uranus. Uranus is the fantasy world these lefties live in. We are from Mars and AIDS is from Uranus.

26 10 2016
countenance

That would explain how it jumped from either black Africa or the black Caribbean to white urban gay America. But that still doesn’t explain cases like Robert Rayford. I still stand by my contention that blacks had it when they were being loaded on the slave ships.

26 10 2016
Joshua Sinistar

I think you seriously underestimate how promiscuous homosexual men are in the Real World. They say they have 100+ partners a year, but that just means over a hundred. Its actually way over a hundred, closer to probably a thousand due to the bathhouse orgy scenes. The Homosexual guys lead every category of STDs every year. They just made headlines about Syphilis, because Syphilis used to be curable but is now available in a new improved Penicillin resistant form.
That story about CIA developing this is interesting, but no way HIV with a ten year gestation would be valuable as a weapon. Even for wiping out unwanted populations, AIDS takes way too long to be effective. There is however an interesting theory that some cases of AIDS aren’t HIV, but immunoproblems due to chemicals in food or water. That could be legit.

26 10 2016
countenance

I don’t doubt your first sentence. But I don’t think it necessarily refutes my theory that black African people were carriers for centuries.

26 10 2016
Cranmer

From Wikipedia ‘timeline of HIV/AIDS’ page

Genetic studies of the virus indicate that, in or about 1966, HIV first arrived in the Americas, infecting one person in Haiti. At this time, many Haitians were working in Congo, providing the opportunity for infection.[9][medical citation needed]

Since a citation is needed, seems iffy. Also, why take Haitians to the Congo? I don’t see the upside.

26 10 2016
countenance

Like I said, HIV was already not only in the hemisphere, but in the country, and in fact, in my city, in 1966.

26 10 2016
Alex the Goon

The only reason I haven’t gone completely off-grid, and continue to pay taxes, is my belief that the CIA engineered AIDS, Ebola-chan, Zika, and other goodies. If your theory is correct, and the ooks have simply “had it” in their blood for centuries, I may have to file amended returns for the past few years, asking for a full refund.

26 10 2016
Stealth

I doubt there was anything sexual going on between the Africans and their Simian neighbors. Chimpanzees are not known to be easy to handle.

27 10 2016
Hard Right

Maybe it was wounds received during an attempted muh dikking that transferred the virus?

26 10 2016
sondjata

You don’t need a lot of people going back and forth. Many caribbean blacks worked ships between Europe and America. Similarly for Africans. Congo is Franco-phone Africa, it is entirely conceivable and probable that such transmission could be recent. Also remember Malcolm X discussing the sexual habits he observed when he was a pimp.

Also if you read Philosophies and Opinions, you’ll find Garvey talking with Africans from all over Africa while on a steamship.

I think you’re dead wrong about the slave ship carrier thing. with the rates of young marriage, blacks would have been dropping like flies after 1865. the black carrier population is not that large as it is not large in any population.

26 10 2016
countenance

The more I think of it the more I think you have to be right about that. If they had it all along, then we’d be swimming in historical/medical literature and documentation of typical AIDS deaths among blacks in the United States and before that the colonies going back just about 400 years now.

26 10 2016
Alex the Goon

What would an AIDS death have looked like 100 years ago? If Kuntakintavious’ immune system was shot, he would’ve caught some pedestrian disease, and just died. He certainly wouldn’t have spent the last year of his $20 life in a GRoIDS ward, being kept alive with the costliest snake oils, until his 80-pound skeleton couldn’t stand it anymore.

26 10 2016
countenance

We know that AIDS patients that die of AIDS don’t actually die of AIDS, they die of whatever infection gets them because the AIDS has ruined their immune system, could even be a common cold. However, AIDS is an STD, meaning that AIDS patients also have other STDs, and that’s what gets them. The reason why I’m starting to doubt my own theory is that there should have been a whole lot of relatively young-ish black deaths in 1900 recorded due to, what was at the time, called VD.

27 10 2016
Dr Duke

Wow I guess I am going to be the one to say this. I think it made the jump from chimps to blacks because the blacks are so much closer to chimps biologically.

27 10 2016
countenance

But we’re wondering precisely how it made the jump in the literal physical sense. The two theories they let us consider are that chimps bit blacks, blacks ate chimp meat. The taboo one they won’t let us think about…

27 10 2016
Hard Right

Nigger tried to fuck a monkey. Monkey resisted. Nigger’s wounds were infected by HIV.

27 10 2016
Hypie

lol, Monkey undoubtedly resisted advances by Sub-Saharan rapists but many were overwhelmed & subjected to some monkey-on-monkey sex. Unlike Sub-Saharan’s, monkeys, chimps actually have some pride so am sure they resisted their sub-saharan rapists as best they could !!!

28 10 2016
antipater_1

Perhaps the virus went from blacks to the chimps instead?

It's your dime, spill it. And also...NO TROLLS ALLOWED~!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.




%d bloggers like this: