Why Am I Thinking About Andrew Jackson Right Now?

9 02 2017

San Francisco


Beats me.




13 responses

9 02 2017


10 02 2017
Dr Duke

He should be in color.
I want to gaze upon his glorious orange visage every time I go to the ATM.
Can we put Pepe on the back?

10 02 2017
Joshua Sinistar

Yeah no. They will put Harriet Mudball on there. That’s good. Since this worthless Monopoly Money is how they get ANYTHING. When people realize its Zimbabwe Dollahs, they will get what its worth. NOTHING.

10 02 2017
High Arka

You’re probably thinking about Jackson because he resisted central banking, and would have Trump, like all presidents since 1912, drawn and quartered for treason. Either that, or you’re so desperate for a glimmer of imaginary potential character in this empty age that you’ve confused Trump’s intention to fight a decision in court with Jackson’s suggestion that he use the army to defend the founders’ progeny from the forebears of Trump’s cabinet.

10 02 2017

Remember, the Supreme Court declared the Trail of Tears to be unconstitutional.

10 02 2017
High Arka

And yet they were completely cool with Reconstruction and the Fed/WW1. If they’d been deported and/or hanged and/or reduced to trying criminal & civil cases and disputes between the States only, we wouldn’t have to make pitiful nasal cheers at someone who has no intention of assaulting his familial countenances in the Judicial branch.

10 02 2017
Alex the Goon

From Buchanan: “Trump has warned the judges that if they block his travel ban, and this results in preventable acts of terror on American soil, they will be held accountable. As rightly they should.
If terrorists get through because of this, TRUMP will be held accountable, because it’s HIS fucking job to keep them out, and not let some pussy-hatted judge stand in his way.

10 02 2017
High Arka

I love that approach, but sadly, it’s probably well understood that anything Trump doesn’t accomplish will be vaguely blamed on “Democrats,” and Trump be canonized anyway, setting up his descendants for future television office, excuse me, I mean public office.

10 02 2017

“nuh uh, blue backs.”

10 02 2017
John Vawter

Worcester v. Georgia: “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!”

11 02 2017
Nicholas Stix

Uh, did something change on this page, or did I not see right a couple of days ago?

12 02 2017

If the new administration is serious about these things, then they must organize and govern accordingly. With all due respect to the new DEFSEC and AG, there’s been no real effort to bring in people actually willing to carry out this great organizational change.

Labor, who already has vast enforcement powers against Big Ag and the like, isn’t even going to hearings yet. I’m not aware of any USAs appointed yet, and no DOJ lower tier confirmed positions. One of the only independent agency heads confirmed to date seems very interested in ripping apart the alliance that put his new Boss in power.

There’s already mutterings about the Debt Ceiling as well.

12 02 2017

I love that name, Beauregard. Sessions is a race-realist; though he could not or would not admit to it. Go Beauregard.

It's your dime, spill it. And also...NO TROLLS ALLOWED~!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: