My Somewhat Unique Take on California’s New HIV Laws (Introduction to the Howard Jones Doctrine)

14 11 2017

Sacramento, California

During my involuntary sojourn, one of the hot breaking WTAF stories (What The Actual Fuck, in this case, quite literally, because it involves sex) was that the state of California has officially demoted the concept of less than fully informed full consent sexual transmission of HIV from a felony to a mere misdemeanor. I might need correction here, but I heard that the same legislation also does the same for those who refuse to tell blood banks that they’re HIV+ before donating their blood.

The LGBTQ-BLT-BBQ-LOL alphabet gang has made this one of their top drawer political agenda items for the last five maybe ten years, and now that they’ve got gay “marriage” in the bag, this and World War T will probably be their big #1 and #1-A demands for awhile. They got their way in California, which means that it will roll downhill like a snowball, becoming an avalanche, in many other cities and states. If it was HRC instead of DJT stacking the Federal judiciary and SCOTUS right now, they’d try the Hail Mary in the Federal courts right about now.

Their official reasoning is that since HIV/AIDS treatment regimes are now so good that contracting HIV is now no longer a death sentence, that the legal paradigm that treated not telling your sex partners of your HIV+ status, or committing rape or sexual assault against someone else whilst HIV+, almost as a form of attempted murder, is passe and obsolete. Of course, while it’s been quite a few months since I’ve been coherent enough to write blog posts, before then, I don’t remember reading or seeing or hearing that the complete HIV treatment regimen, blood tests, specialist visits, prescriptions, counseling, and sundries, has suddenly become affordable for everyone. It might have in the several months of my involuntary sojourn, but I have my doubts. So the gay activists’ official reasoning rings rather hollow, until such a time.

You can wipe all that away, because I’m going to tell you the real reason why they want this so badly. When thinking about these things, it’s often incumbent upon you to turn your head sideways toward the official reasoning, and think subversively. Do enough subversive thinking, and you just might arrive at the real reason, the truth.

And what is the truth?

Exact quote from State Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) (*), who was a sponsor of the legislation, after Gov. Jerry Brown signed it into law:

“Today California took a major step toward treating HIV as a public health issue, instead of treating people living with HIV as criminals.”

For as long as I can remember and have been able to think about these things, which, considering the subject matter, has been since I found one of those “books” lying around in a back alley as a ten-year old (1987 on the calendar) and deflowered my own mind, only shortly before I got the official talk, (the book I found was totally clinical and dispassionate, but thorough, and covered everything, except strangely for the sexuality of lesbians, and I didn’t fill in those blanks until I got to college), and, from my subsequent reading and understanding of the history of the politics of HIV/AIDS and of the gay lobby and politically and socially organized male homosexual interests in the Western world that happened before my intellectual consummation, the long sought Holy Grail of gay male activism has been to decouple the concept of male anal sexual intercourse from the concept of an easy transmission vector for HIV/AIDS. Or, if you want vulgar street lingo, they don’t want you to think about lots of men buttfucking lots of men raw dog and promiscuously being an easy way to spread HIV/AIDS.

That effort has had four major prongs: First, infiltrating the institutions (media, academia, the advertising-sales-marketing-public relations continuum) and then using those positions to bully ordinary people and make thinking about the link between anal intercourse and easy HIV/AIDS transmission taboo. Second, infiltrating the medical profession, and then using those positions to censor honest medical science based discussion of how anal intercourse is an easy transmission vector. Third, a political pincher movement of infiltrating important political foundations on the inside (lobbying, think tanks, Congressional staffers, the permanent executive bureaucracy) and street and social agitation on the outside (ACT-UP, et al.), to bully the architects of health care and fiscal policy to divert as many resources as possible to R&D of HIV/AIDS treatments and cures, to hasten the day when worrying about contracting the virus is moot from a medical and health standpoint. Fourth, a combination of all these tactics, plus infiltrating certain sympathetic (i.e. moderate-to-liberal) religious institutions, in order to box out and marginalize and pathologize religious-based aversion to homosexuality, especially male homosexuality.

To wit, Mr. Wiener’s quote above. And also, to wit, the Antifa-style militancy of certain factions of the activist sphere of homosexual men in the late ’80s.

We’re instructed to think of HIV/AIDS as we think of an influenza pandemic, something that is close to impossible to stop or slow down in the person-to-person transmission using human intervention, and absolutely impossible to stop with the internal or external imposition of sexual mores. The end result is that we’re not supposed to think that the anal sex of homosexual men is morally wrong, that went out the window years ago, and now, we’re told not to think that it’s even medically problematic. For much the same reason, we’re being conditioned to think of black violent crime (“gun violence”) NOT as something that black people commit (**), but as a spreading viral or bacterial infection epidemic, which is the real reason why there’s this big push on to examine “gun violence” as a “public health crisis.” It’s the Howard Jones Doctrine at work, in both cases.

The stark improvements of the HIV/AIDS treatment regimen since the early 1990s has been a godsend for that agenda.

Howard Jones Doctrine:

 

(*) – He also sponsored the legislation, which also passed and Jerry Brown also signed, that throws you in the hoosegow if you engage in biologically accurate science, i.e. call a gender bending freak by their biological pronoun instead of their chosen one. Even though the circumstances behind that take some explanation. But that spawned the running joke that in California, you now get more time for using the wrong pronouns than spreading HIV.

(**) – The black undertow is really good at formulating exculpatory idiom.  For instance, in the ghetto, you don’t commit a crime, you “catch a case.”  Likewise, you don’t commit murder, you “catch a body.”

Advertisements

Actions

Information

3 responses

15 11 2017
Paul Rain

I strongly support the treatment of HIV/GRIDS as a public health problem, in the vein of Fidel Castro’s courageous methods.

15 11 2017
Pinned Post (Newer Content Follows Below) | Countenance Blog

[…] Crime Report, Decline of BLM, NFL Kneeling, Anti-Cop Urban Whites, Astronomy News, 95 Theses 500th, CA HIV Laws, Illini vs Math, HRC Doc Hoax, Donna Brazile, STL Prop P, Hamilton in STL, Kenneka Jenkins, […]

16 11 2017
Nightowl2548

I didn’t know they even bothered prosecuting the gays for spreading it to each other. How could they? Half of them have it? There’d be no room left in the courts for black criminality if they got involved with this. The only times I’ve ever heard of cops getting involved in spreading aids is when some woman gets it?

It's your dime, spill it. And also...NO TROLLS ALLOWED~!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: