Only In St. Louis…

13 03 2018

Downtown

Can an active sitting incumbent member of the Board of Aldermen have FIVE outstanding bench warrants issued by the very city whose government he serves.

No insurance, suspended license, and yet another open warrant from Jefferson City, to boot.

Advertisements




I Have a Suggestion For April

1 02 2018

Downtown

2:

Pan-African flag raised at St. Louis City Hall for Black History Month

Today is the start of Black History Month. To mark the occasion, the red, black and green Pan-African flag will be raised at St. Louis City Hall at 10 a.m.

The St. Louis African-American Aldermanic Caucus suggested the move to honor the contributions African-Americans have made to St. Louis.

I have a suggestion for the month of April.

Though I know it will never be anything more than a suggestion, because this city can’t even tolerate a statue in a park.

But this reminds me of some unfinished business in this space.

Through most of 2015 and extending into early 2016, we had someone here in the comment boxes that some of you might be tempted to call a troll, but that’s too harsh and unfair to describe his presence and rhetoric.  Let’s call him an incredulous interlocutor.  Anyway, on occasions when I’d do a Confederate flag or statue posts in this space, one of his favorite retorts would go something like this:  “But how would you feel if an official public building few the red-black-green Pan-African flag?”

DERP.

And that leads me to my point, in finishing this heretofore unfinished business, which I remiss in not doing back then.

The first problem with the mentality that there’s some necessary requirement of fairness, in that if you have Confederate than you have to have Pan-African, and vice versa, is that it does not practically manifest in the real world.  As we can see in our own fair city right now.

The second problem is that the politics of settling the question of Confederate yay or nay juxtaposed with Pan-African yay or nay are hardly ever predicated on the bedrock of fairness, but almost always on the bedrock of tribal demographics.  Virtually nobody in Official St. Louis (by that, I mean the continuum of public, quasi-public, quasi-private and private sector important people in the city and region), who either caused, support or have no problem with the Pan-African flag flying over City Hall this month are going to turn around and say MUH FAIRNESS in the process of advocating flying the CBF over City Hall in the month of April (Confederate Heritage/History Month, in case you didn’t know), or at least returning the UDC monument to Forest Park and reconstructing the short Confederate Drive therein in accordance.  Likewise, last current year, when Official St. Louis connived to kick the UDC statue out of Forest Park, not a one of them so conspiring had the mentality that what they wanted to be done had to be done because it was unfair that there was a Confederate monument but no Pan-African monument in Forest Park.  That’s because it’s all about MUH DEMOGRAPHICS and not MUH FAIRNESS in the minds’ eyes of Official St. Louis, and for that matter, just about all of everyone else.

Third, and on this, if the incredulous interlocutor wants to correct me, I’ll be more than happy, but I highly doubt he was in the comment boxes of sites and blogs like Root, Grio or any of the many problacktard nodes on Ye Olde Internets lecturing them about MUH FAIRNESS, stating that they shouldn’t advocate for Pan-African because they would have to drop their opposition to Confederate out of a sense of fairness.  Here in the real world, when this issue base comes up, the fairness sword that the left wing and vicinity swings around is a single-edged sword that they almost always swing in only one direction.  And the disparate impact is that they want us to think about the politics of these things in abstract and universalist political terms, while at the same time either being too scared to oppose, or not actually opposing, or being okay with, or sometimes even encouraging the tribalist particularism of the other side.  White people have to be abstract and universalist, whilst non-whites can be tribal all the live long day — When that happens, I start reaching for Shift+9 and Shift+0.

 





Repetition Is the Mother of Skill

15 12 2017

Downtown

The reality show that is the search for the next SLPD chief is almost over.

I’ll write here what I wrote in comment form a few weeks ago, because it’s so cogent that it simply must be widely understood.

***

The two most overrated public authority positions going are: Police chief, and school board superintendent. As you know, I still technically live in Richmond Heights, and I couldn’t tell you to save my life (errr, bad choice of words) who the Police Chief of Richmond Heights is or who the superintendent of the Maplewood Richmond Heights School District is, just off the top of my head, even back in the days when I wasn’t brain damaged.

It is only in big cities with plentiful black people that there’s all this political hoo-haa over police chiefs and school district superintendents, over who gets selected, how they’re selected, and what they do while in power. Probably because there’s so much desperation because the city has enough black undertow that is doubly violent (relating to the police) and stupid (relating to the schools), that there’s this presumption that the chief and superintendent can bring some sort of magic fairy dust to make everything better. When in reality, they have no such powers.

Just like the number of cops and acuity of cops really doesn’t make a difference in violent crime, it really doesn’t matter who the police chief is or isn’t, either. Ditto with schools, one superintendent is the same as the other, and a superintendent has nothing to do with student race demographics.





My Unique Take on St. Louis City Proposition P (The “P” Doesn’t Mean What You Think It Means)

14 11 2017

Downtown

Back in February and March leading up to the April election in St. Louis City, city voters were told to vote yes on Proposition 1, an extra half cent on the sales tax, because:

Cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops MetroLink cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops MetroLink cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops MetroLink cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops cops.

Predictably, city voters approved Prop 1, because, well, because cops.

It wasn’t until after Prop 1 was safely in the bag that the media around here admitted the truth, which I don’t think even I grasped before the fact, that most of Prop 1 was going to be used for the MissingLink and really none of it for cops.  The dough it generates is by no means enough to pay for the entire cost of the North-South line, because they’re figuring that it’ll run somewhere close to $2 billion.  What Prop 1 funds provides is everything in the pre-construction phrase, the engineering work, the design work, the environmental studies, the right-of-way acquisition (if any is needed), sundries, and most importantly, money to pay people to lobby the Feds to open up Uncle Sam’s wallet for the $2 billion it will take to start turning dirt.  But, again, none for cops.

Unfortunately, on the same day Prop 1 passed in the city, St. Louis County voters passed Proposition P, also an extra half cent on the sales tax, and that money actually was used for cops, and almost entirely to raise the pay scales for the County Browns (St. Louis County Police Department).  City officials were hoping (Or were they?  See below) that Prop P wouldn’t pass in the county, for two main reasons:  One, they knew they were feeding city voters a line of boo sheet that Prop 1 was going to be used for cops, but two and more crucially, because they knew that Prop 1 wouldn’t benefit cops, a successful Prop P in the county would mean that the already existing and noticeable pay scale gap between County Browns and SLPD would grow much wider, and that it did.  Which now only serves as a magnet for SLPD to make the move across the county line and defect to the better paid County Browns.  Or so we’re told, and I’ll get to that in a moment.

Which means City Hall had to come back again and ask city voters for another half cent nut, (Proposition P, not to be confused with the aforementioned April proposition in the county), on the November ballot, (thereby giving enough time for people of short memory not to remember that Prop 1 back in April was supposed to be for the cops), and according to the pro-P mailers, lit and media buys, specifically to fund pay scale increases for both SLPD and SLFD to keep “good, experienced first responders” from defecting to the County Browns and county fire departments.  Even more than that, pro-P propaganda said that with the recent spike in violent crime in the city, Prop P was needed more than ever to keep good experienced SLPD cops in the city so they can help combat the crime.

And of course you can probably figure out how it turned out on voting day, if you aren’t here and don’t already know the answer.

The official reasoning in support of Prop P raises more questions than answers, and when you mash up that boat load of question marks with the political skulduggery around here from back in the spring, and then do a little subversive thinking, you’ll figure out what’s really going on, you’ll find the real answer. Consider:

(1) Even if Prop P funds do wind up absolutely equalizing SLPD and County Browns pay scales, that still won’t stop the city-to-county cop bleeding, (provided it is actually occurring, and, once again, I’ll get to that), because in order to do that, the SLPD pay scales would need to be not just the same as County Browns, but in fact, much higher.  Simply because, for the most part, St. Louis City is riskier policing work than most of unincorporated St. Louis County and St. Louis County munis without their own police department, in spite of the fact that County Browns have to deal with most of the worst of North County.  Remember this thing called the risk-reward continuum?  That concept makes another appearance in today’s post storm.  Who wants to run the risk of being the next Jason Stockley (whose saga can also be found elsewhere in today’s post storm) on the SLPD unless SLPD pay is much higher (“hazard pay”) than everywhere else?  Prop P “at best” only equalizes city with county, there’s nowhere near the kind of money to do the kind of hazard pay that is honestly necessary to stop all this supposed bleeding.

(2) But I don’t think there is really a whole lot of bleeding.  The pro-P propagandists insisted that there’s this constant steady massive barrage of cops leaving the city for the county.  The problem with that is this:  I hardly think the County Browns can just on a whim hire any ole SLPD officer who wants to make the move.  Sure, they might be able to take in a few such “refugees,” but no more than that.  Clayton has budgetary pressures just as much as Downtown.  Besides, most County Browns officers came there from a path other than starting out with the SLPD; It’s not as if that prerequisite exists to get on with the St. Louis County PD.  If there was, there would be political hell to pay in the county.

(3) I don’t actually think the important people in the city were “hoping” that the April Prop P in the county would fail, I think they knew it would pass, (first responder ballot measures rarely fail, owning to the high public approval of first responders, which is a segue to my BLM commentary of today’s post storm), thereby giving them their next move to do what they really wanted to do and do it for the reason they really wanted to do it.  I’m about to get to that.

(4) Then there’s the biggie.  I know the qualitative difference between a good experienced cop and a not-so-good inexperienced cop, and what difference it makes in terms of job performance.  However, I am not convinced that even if every SLPD officer was of the former variety rather than the latter, that it would make a significant difference in the violent crime rate.  Back in May, I wrote a post here wherein I quoted my own AR comment about the questionable notion that increasing the number of beat cops in a given department within the relevant range of reality can necessarily result in a proportional and commensurate reduction in the violent crime rate.  I think a lot of the same reasoning I present there applies to the question of the good-experienced vs bad-inexperienced spectrum when it comes to street level enforcers.  Just for the fact that all the cops are book smart and street smart and long tenured as opposed to the polar opposites isn’t going to prevent N’Deshawntavious from murking Ooktavious over the last slug of malt liquor on the corner of Natural Bridge and Newstead.  I am of the opinion that violent crime is going to be what it’s going to be regardless of the relevant range of the number of cops or the professional acuity of the cops, because things other than those are the driving forces behind it.

Believe me, if I’ve game theorized through these things, then the city’s power elite have thought of this, or if not, some brainiac apparatchik very similar to your brain-damaged Blogmeister, the sort that works in some corner office in some suite halfway up Met Square, has thought of it and told them all.  The connections between myself and the metro area’s power elites were tenuous at best even back in the days when I was professionally closest to them, and now, thanks to being so rudely interrupted back in July, they’re next to nonexistent.  In spite of that, I have a good enough “feel” on the really important people in the area and how they think and what they think, and I can triangulate what they’re up to.  (Because, when you have a good enough read on human nature, and you let yourself think subversively, you wind up seeing right through the opaque smokescreens of official pronouncements in order to discover the truth.)  The real movers and shakers in the city already realize all the Doubting Thomas factors you just read, but they wanted Prop P anyway.

I’m about to tell you the real reason why, doing more of my world-renowned subversive thinking.  Translated into Ebonics, I’m finna spit the real.

Try to think of a reason why a city government of significant size would need more revenue to spend on first responders, police and fire, but a purpose that’s tangential to the purpose rather than the things themselves.  Hint:  The P in Proposition P does stand for a word that starts with P, but it’s not “police.”

All you need is one word:

Pensions.

The Ferguson Effect black violent crime spike around here provided City Hall and certain attached civic movers and shakers the perfect excuse/opportunity/cover to extort already nervous city voters for another half cent sales tax to cover partially if not completely the coming first responder pension fund financial pressures on City Hall that are about to become real big problems in the coming years, even more so than they have been in, say, the last ten years.  (Recall that FRS, Firefighter Retirement System, was one of Francis Slay’s big political headaches during his third and fourth terms as mayor.)   To put it another way, while the rubes are all worried about N’Deshawntavious and Ooktavious, we can manipulate their anxiety and fleece them to solve the future pension crisis, feeding them a bunch of tripe and boo sheet and excuses and politically easy answers to get them to go along.  Get while the gettin’s good.

If my cynicism is correct, then I think the SLPD (and SLFD) pay scales will be raised some, but not to equalization levels with the county, but it won’t really make a difference in any way shape or fashion, as I just explained in this epic post, and the city power brokers already know the same things.  Most of the money will be used for pensions.  Because a lot of other cities and states are facing future pension problems that are even worse than St. Louis’s, I expect other places to run this scam.  Baltimore, for example, also experiencing a Ferguson Effect black violent crime spike, will probably try this.

BONUS OBSERVATION

Postmortem after P passed.  Even if you take the pro-P propaganda totally at face value, and I just spent over 1,800 words to explain that and why I don’t, then even these hopes don’t make sense.  At face value, Prop P will merely result in the cops already on the SLPD being paid more, which means CWE residents (“the smartest people in town”) must believe that the same cops that somehow couldn’t prevent CWE residents from being violent crime victims before November 7 will somehow magically be able to start doing so just because they’re being paid more.  Brain damaged local Alt-Right blogger figures it out but a neighborhood full of professors and geniuses and high cognitive functioning professionals can’t?





Everything Old and Useless…

15 06 2017

Downtown

…Is new and useless again.

The St. Louis City Board of Aldermen already passed a resolution advocating slavery reparations, back in 2001.  It got only two no votes, both of them are now no longer aldermen.





Lyda Tries to Hold On for the Eight Year Count

12 05 2017

Downtown

Okay, here’s what Lyda’s plan will be:

A bunch of tweaks, a bunch of spending on this that and the other, hire a few new cops, hire a black woman as police chief, and throw a bunch of rhetoric against the wall and hope that something sticks.

In the hopes that everyone can make it until the next Democrat President, at which time AFFH will be restarted, which means shoveling the ooks and dindus out of the city.





Ferris Dindu’s Day Off

24 04 2017

Downtown

My good buddy (ahem, ahem, cough, cough), doesn’t really seem to say anything in his latest op-ed.

So I guess I’ll have to ride to his rescue, as friends often do.

Murder doesn’t take a day off around here because we can’t seem to get rid of our dindus.   Mind you, our dindus, for some odd reason, have been especially agitated over the last five years, especially over the last three years, for some reason I can’t seem to (cough, cough, Trayvon) put my fingers on (cough, cough, Fergaza Strip).

They won’t even take a Sunday night off.

I do see something a wee bit contradictory here.  Messenger, in a round about way, claims that Dotson is just peddling excuses when, among other things, he leans on the “weak gun laws” crutch, but then, just a few words later, he gushes all over Lyda’s “courage” because she stayed in the city and “started a political career” to combat violence.  Putting the pieces together, most of her anti-violence political energy ever since she first won alderwoman in 1997 was been to caterwaul about guns.

Backing up for a moment, Messenger alludes to Dotson leaning on the crutch of “pointing out that the city’s homicide numbers are skewed compared to most big cities because of the city’s separation from St. Louis County.”  That’s the excuse the CVC cooked up more than three years ago, and it only took me a few moments to blow through it.

One more thing:

Politics won’t fix the city’s murder problem. Neither will a new chief. The challenge is greater than that. Step one is to follow the advice of Dan Isom, the chief who preceded Dotson.

“How much do you care about every person who has lost their life in the city of St. Louis?” Isom asked at a mayoral forum in February. Each of the 47 people who as of Friday had lost their lives in the city has a story. They were utility workers and sportsmen. They were students and basketball players. They were husbands, and wives, who leave behind, perhaps, a spouse who will dedicate her life to solving the violence that has plagued this Midwestern city for decades.

The problem is that Isom is the only person of major public consequence who wants us to think about the victims.  Because if we actually did start thinking about the victims, then we’ll notice things and conclude that most of them are the same kind of thugs that murdered them.  Most of the rest are innocent white people, which then forces us to think about anti-white hate crimes, which of course ((())) and Co. absolutely don’t want.