Newsflash: New York, Washington DC, Boston and Hawaii Are Expensive

27 07 2015


Because that’s something I would have never been able to guess otherwise.

Blogmeister Echo Syndrome

23 07 2015

Albany, New York

Me, May 26:

I happen to think the left’s real silent goal with higher urban-specific minimum wages is to drive NAMs out of cities, because NAMs tend to low wage jobs whose wages are less than the proposed or implemented urban minimum wages.

A better way of saying that is that if the urban minimum wage is higher than the wage equilibrium for fast feeders, then the fast feeders can’t operate in the urban area.  If the fast feeders aren’t there, the NAMs that work there and the NAMs that eat there suddenly don’t think the urban area is such a dope place to beez, fo’ real, mo shizzle.  So they leave the cities, suing their Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Section 8 voucher, plant themselves in a suburban apartment complex close to their 365BellCurve salt licks.  They’re lovin’ it.

With that having been said, we have this blogmeister vindicating news out of New York State today.

Notice it applies only to the fast food industry, and will apply to New York City (think:  gentrification, hipsters, SWPLs) three years before it applies to the rest of the state.

It’s the next best thing to Andrew Cuomo actually using the NYS National Guard to round up ghetto blacks from New York City and physically dumping them somewhere else.

It’s a Black Thang, Understand.

5 07 2015

Chocolate City St. Louis

While the crux of subprime mortgage lending and the subsequent collapse was centered on “sand state” Hispanics, locally, because St. Louis hardly has any Hispanics, subprime was a synonym for black, and it is in the black zip codes where the effects of the collapse still linger.  It’s also why the P-D only cites the national subprime statistics for blacks and non-Hispanic whites, and not for Hispanics.

If you can ignore the liberal histrionics, (you say “predatory lending,” I say “affirmative action mortgages”), then it makes for a decent article.


3 04 2015



Except for rich, Americans’ incomes fell last year


But broken down into quintiles, those in the top 20 percent of incomes saw their money stream grow by 0.9 percent to $166,048 on average.

Every other group lost ground, with the bottom 20 percent losing the most: their average income dropped 3.5 percent to $9,818.

Thank goodness our elected officials have a solution:  Import more people and give them work permits.

The top 20% really isn’t that rich, $101,000 is the household income threshold for that the highest quintile.  $101,000 really doesn’t go that far in expensive metro areas.  However, I bet that if you narrowed the top percentile metric to smaller and smaller percentiles, the higher percentages their incomes grew.

The God That Costs

20 10 2014


I now think like HHH that democratic republicanism is defective by design.  Unlike HHH, I’m not so sure that classical monarchy is the solution.

However, I couldn’t help but think of this video and HHH’s assertion that democratic republicanism has actually retarded quality economic growth when I read this story this morning.  And since I found it on Instapundit, you knew Glenn Reynolds would end with with a short editorial, in this case:

But all that regulation — while making the country much poorer — has vastly enriched the parasite class. They have a bigger slice of a smaller pie, and they like it that way because it makes them feel important.

And this parasitism that has benefited the parasite class at the expense of having a $32 trillion economy instead of a $17 trillion economy is blood on the hands of duhmocrazy.

I also think one of the prime offending elements to explain why the growth of American GDP per capita is far slower than it might be is that, thanks to the 1965 No Borders Act and similar subsequent legislation and the non-enforcement of what little immigration law remains, the denominator of “capitas” is way higher than it should be.

As an aside, HHH in this presentation brought up the concept of hereditarian ownership of a house. He was right in what he said, but he forgot a crucial element: The people that genuinely own their house (even if “ownership” is in the mortgage and equity accruing sense) don’t have just an interest in maintaining their house for their own distant future and for the future of the people that are destined to inherit it and future generations of their own gene line, they have a direct incentive to make sure the entire neighborhood remains quality and livable and pleasant. Extrapolating that to an entire country run by a hypothetical patriotic nationalist hereditarian monarchy, the incumbent king or queen isn’t just invested in good government or good governance at the moment, he or she wants a consummately quality country. Just as the hereditarian homeowner wouldn’t want a black-filled Section 8 apartment complex to be built on an empty parcel over in the next block, the hereditarian governor wouldn’t want the cores of his or her cities to become a conga line of Bell Curve Cities.


Another example via Instapundit on how duhmocrazy retards genuine growth and innovation.


30 05 2014


In spite of some really questionable fluffy duff metrics being classified as GDP recently, and in spite of government spending being as high as ever, don’t forget that it’s counted in GDP ( = Consumption + Investment + Government Spending + Exports ), and in spite of fracking for certain fossil fuel natural resources whose crude prices are still pretty high, the American economy shrank in 1Q14 over 4Q13.

Imagine how bad it would be if they told the truth, and the kook left had its way all the time on fracking.

Ball of Confusion

17 03 2014

Washington, D.C.

Computer World headline and sub-headline:

Gates sees software replacing people; Greenspan calls for more H-1Bs
Both agree that U.S. secondary education system needs much improvement

Translation: People will be less and less necessary over time, so the solution is to import more people. And also…fix the schools.


As you can see, Sailer took this story up after a certain snarky birdie whispered in his ear.  After reading this article again, this part suddenly jumped out at me:

“We cannot manage our very complex, highly sophisticated capital structure with what’s coming out of our high schools,” said Greenspan, former chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Well pardon me, Al, but when did we ever expect the typical high school graduate to manage our complex sophisticated capital markets?  Hint:  The answer is never.  Not even in the days when a high school diploma actually meant something.

I guess Bill & Al think that the junior and senior years of high school should cram in a combination of B-school, grad school in economics and a near John Nash level math curriculum.  If that’s what they want, fine.  But realize it’ll have a disparate impact on NAMs, and just about everyone else for that matter.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,400 other followers