Somebody Bono

23 11 2015

Delft, Netherlands

IKEA, gag.

Along with:

Many big businesses have donated millions to help rescue operations. Google, Goldman Sachs, Volkswagen, Zara, Ericsson, Volvo, H&M and Brown Forman all donated to the UNHCR or other organizations.

I wonder if they think they have something to gain.

The strange part is that corporate dominance of political power in continental and Scandinavian Europe is far less than the same in the United States.  Yet, they still have enough steam to influence immigration policy, and they’re definitely pulling Angela Merkel’s strings.

Make Up Your Mind

2 11 2015



A Mass Migration Crisis, and It May Yet Get Worse

Worse? This is the same paper that claims that this kind of “mass migration,” to both Europe and the United States, is a virtue.

One thing I noticed late last week is that in media articles where the topic is the distribution of “refugees,” it is written about as a burden that must be shared, spread around, dispersed. But when the topic is the mass immigration in general, it is written about as a blessing that will solve the problems of increasing wages skills gap age demographic collapse workers to do the jobs that native born whites won’t do lack of votes for center-left parties, or whatever.

Like I wrote here last week when I broached this same observation, it can’t be both a blessing and a burden at the same time.  However, I have a Ferrari of a mind, so of course I know there’s a way both can be true at the same time.  It’s a blessing for plutocrats and corporations, because it solves the problem of increasing wages and salaries, and at the same time it’s a burden for the same plutocrats and corporations, because the Patterson’s First Axiom effects of the mass migration is making the natives restless, so they have to find a way to arrange the “refugee” resettlement in such a way to diffuse white reactionary anger.  What, you thought I was going to say that it was a burden for the native born whites and for public welfare systems?  Name me the plutocrat or corporation that really honestly cares about either.

In related news, this NR article (parts of which read like they were not written in NR) reminds me of a thought I had a few days ago.  When, for example, Sweden is taking in enough refugees that if scaled up to the United States, it would mean that we’re taking in another whole state of Indiana.  But the numbers don’t interest me quite as much as the precarious situation intra-Hajnal Line European countries and their welfare states are in.  The “refugees” are going where the welfare states are the most generous, but the countries where the welfare states are the most generous and ubiquitous can only have those welfare states because their (until recently almost entirely ethnically homogeneous) people have a high level of social altruism and social trust and social capital.  Throw enough of a critical mass of non-white moochers into the mix, and it’s going to have a far more rapid and drastic negative effect on the financial health of NW Euro welfare states than even a proportional import of people would have on the American welfare state, which is significantly less generous and ubiquitous than, say, Sweden’s.  Our favorite domestic non-white racial group is one big reason why our welfare state never did and never could even rise to British levels, much less Swedish levels.

Europe Adapts

27 10 2015



Islamic invasion pulls trigger: Europe now scrambles for guns


Alan Gottlieb, executive vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation, said he recently returned from a gun rights event in Europe, where he sensed a change in attitude toward firearms.

“I just returned from a gun rights meeting in Belgium, and I can attest that all over Europe people now want the means to defend themselves,” Gottlieb told WND. “Self-defense is no longer a dirty word. In countries like Austria, where it is still legal to own a firearm, gun sales are at record levels. I can tell you first-hand that people in Europe now wish they had a Second Amendment.”

In the coming years, white Europeans are going to be doing quite a bit of two things as they adapt to all that newfound vibrancy:  Leaving urban areas, and buying guns.

Sounds like a country you know, doesn’t it?

Which leads to another prediction about what white Europeans will start doing in the coming years:  Knocking off the America bashing, at least in those terms.  They’ll suddenly come to understand why.

From Amurrika With Love

31 08 2015


Buckle up, this is big.


On Thursday last, Nicolas Bonnal, writing for the French website Boulevard Voltaire, reported on an Austrian magazine’s scoop – courtesy of leaks from military intelligence stationed in Vienna – that the U.S. government is paying guides and middlemen who bring migrants to Europe across the Mediterranean Sea. The original Info-Direkt article reported that the guides are well-equipped with technology, and are old hands at working Facebook, Twitter and Skype, as were the agents who instigated the Arab Spring.

Though, after reading the rest of this, I don’t think this has much to do with Putin, The Ukraine, NATO or neo-conservative foreign and military policy skullduggery.  Remember who is currently President of the United States — Baraq Obama, no neo-con he.


He Can Be of Help

25 03 2015

Los Angeles

Hollywood Reporter:

Harvey Weinstein Urges Jews to Take on Anti-Semites: “Kick These Guys in the Ass”

“We’re gonna have to get as organized as the mafia,” the mogul told the audience at the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s national tribute dinner, where he was introduced by friend and competitor Jeffrey Katzenberg as “a really nice Jewish boy.”

And then, once you finally get down to the fifth paragraph, you find out that it has nothing to with skinheads in Idaho:

“I’m upset when I read The Atlantic Monthly’s headline that says, ‘Should the Jews leave Europe?’ — a resounding ‘no’ on my end — and [New York Times columnist] David Brooks today talking about how to combat anti-Semitism,” Weinstein said. “It’s like, here we go again, we’re right back where we were [before the Holocaust]. And the lessons of the past are we better stand up and kick these guys in the ass.”

The co-head of The Weinstein Company continued, “I think it’s time that we, as Jews, get together with the Muslims who are honorable and peaceful — but we [also] have to go and protect ourselves. We have to build, once again, back into the breach. There’s a quote from Kurt Vonnegut’s book The Sirens of Titan and it always was the motto of Miramax and now The Weinstein Company. It says, ‘Good can triumph over evil if the angels are as organized as the mafia.’ That’s how we built our company! And, unfortunately, we [Jews] are gonna have to get as organized as the mafia. We just can’t take it anymore. We just can’t take these things. There’s gotta be a way to fight back.”

“While we must be understanding of our Arab brothers and our Islamic brothers,” he added, “we also have to understand that these crazy bastards [Arab and Islamic extremists] are also killing their own — they’re killing neighbors, they’re killing people from all sorts of different races. And, unlike World War II, when we didn’t act right away and we paid the price, we better start acting now. Trust me, I’m the last guy who wants to do anything about it, but I realize if we don’t, we will perish. We can’t allow the bad guys to win. So, as they say in The Godfather, ‘back to the mattresses,’ and back to the idea that we will not ever forget what happened to us.”

They kept the truth relatively deep into the paragraph count.

Yes, organization and clarity of purpose is important.  But, in the short term, maybe Harv could make a few phone calls to his media brethren in Europe and ask them to knock off the implication that Hitler is coming back every time some white person suggests little bit of race-based immigration control.  Endorsements of Nigel Farage and Marine Le Pen would also be nice.

Obviously, that wouldn’t solve all our problems and all their problems, because the Jewish-egalitarian media is only one of several drink-stirring straws.  You always have to consider the cheap labor aspect, and the elect-a-new-people aspect, and the inevitable degeneracy of democratic republics aspect.  Even if every media Jew everywhere in the world converted to our cause overnight, there’s still a pretty steep mountain to climb.

But, when you can be of help, you should be.

How Barry How?

17 01 2015

Washington, D.C.


US President Barack Obama on Friday urged European governments to try to better assimilate their Muslim minority populations as they respond to extremist attacks like last week’s shootings in Paris.
How?  What are they supposed to do that they haven’t already been doing a lot of for decades?
“Our biggest advantage, major, is that our Muslim populations feel themselves to be Americans and there is this incredible process of immigration and assimilation that is part of our tradition,” he said.
No, stupid, that’s entirely a function of their only being a very very very small percentage of the population, in fact, not even a full percent.  Once their demographics hit some critical mass, in terms of either numbers or percentage, then the full seventh century comes pouring out of them.  In fact, Dearborn, Michigan already has shown that.

Mobius Chase

14 01 2015

Dresden, Germany

Sort of a dumb article.

First item of dumbassery:

That’s unfortunate, not least because Europe really does have immigration and assimilation problems—as the immigrants, who often face discrimination, experience alienation, and are shut out from many of the guarantees of European life, will tell you themselves. (See this excellent Patrick Weil piece from the TAI archives on life in the banlieues, for example.) Europe writ large has not found a way to offer its immigrant populations the same opportunities given to “natives” (a distinction that often stretches to the second or third generation), but at the same time it has been largely unwilling to decrease the volume of immigrants or discuss new measures for integrating them.

One who would write this thinks that trying to integrate non-white seventh century throwbacks with white Europeans is desirable and in fact imperative.  Hardly anyone reading these words would agree with that.

Second item of dumbassery:

The result, as Mark Steyn and Andrew Stuttaford have been pointing out at National Review, is that when, “the political culture forbids respectable politicians from raising certain topics, then the electorate will turn to unrespectable ones.” The respectable Swedish center-right, for instance, has just committed itself to a minority role in a left-wing government until 2022 to keep the Swedish Democrats, an anti-immigration party with neo-Nazi roots, out of office. The SD is now the only party discussing immigration at all in Sweden, however, and so is likely to grow. Germany’s not that bad off, yet, but it’s only the nascent AfD—once seen as a small, almost upper-crust anti-Euro party  but now a bit more ambivalent about its relationship with the populist protests—is challenging the consensus.

That gets us running around on a Mobius Loop.  On one end of the loop, you have this Steyn-Stuttaford mentality.  On the other end of the loop, you have someone like your ever lovin’ blogmeister, who patiently points out that “respectability” is purely an ideological assessment and not a personal one.  The people and parties advocating immigration restriction are “unrespectable” not because the(ir) people are unrespectable, (Marine LePen is “unrespectable?”), but because their agenda is unrespectable.  It’s not that the ideas are unrespectable because the people advocating them are unrespectable, it’s that the ideas are said to be “unrespectable” and therefore those that advocate them lose all real social status in the mind’s eyes of the owners of the megaphones.

Again, I’ll spout the axiom not invented by me but repeated so often on AR:  If Jared Taylor came up with a cure for cancer, the world would reject it.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,539 other followers