A Rahowa in the Sun

6 01 2017

Your Blogmeister’s Desk

Many of you have already seen this video:

Though the version you saw is probably the non-interjected shorter version.

One of the reasons why I’m glad that Pepe appointed me to be the Alt-Right’s official ambassador to the Sotonation is that since I now have one foot in both our world and their world, I can understand both at the same time in a way nobody else can.  For instance, I can tell you the man doing the speaking goes by the stage name of Sara Suten Seti, and just from that, you can probably deduce what he’s all about, his “Hotep” slash WE WUZ FAROZ proclivities.  He is definitely part of the “pro-black” (problacktard) mental tendency, of course, “pro-black” and “Alt-Right” are alike in that they are both umbrella terms that describe a mental tendency and they overlay a lot of disparate groups, movements, and personalities.  Furthermore, as we use the term “red-pill” or “being red-pilled,” they have a similar word:  Conscious, or being conscious, or being woke.  We say “normie,” but I don’t know what their analogue is, perhaps sellout, coon, Uncle Tom, Uncle Ruckus, soft shoe, tap dancer, buck dancer.

I saw this video again one day before #BLMkidnapping in Chicago, and even before then, the video got me to thinking about a few things, and #BLMkidnapping only hastened the mental urgency.  It’s this business about a race war, and by “race war,” I mean American whites versus American blacks on American territory.

I hope your mutual funds mangler didn’t move heavily into RHWA on the NYSE, that’s all I can say.  Because the chances of such a war popping off are extremely slim.  You know what they say, a race war deferred dries up like a Rahowa in the sun, or a Rahowa delayed is a Rahowa denied, or something like that.

In spite of what seems to be daily travesties like #BLMkidnapping, and many worse, the reason they won’t likely result in a race war any time soon are mainly threefold:

(1) In order for there to be a two-party war, both parties have to be and think of themselves as teams.  That is a necessary prerequisite. Problem is, we don’t think of ourselves as a team. And one of the yuge reasons we don’t is because Jews use their outsize influence in the media and cultural institutions to keep white people from thinking of ourselves as a team, mainly because Jews think that it would be bad for the Jews if we did. Because once white people start noticing things about other groups of people and making collective assessments and waging collective effort to extract collective punishments, which is an inevitable consequence of white people realizing they are a racial team, it won’t be long until we start noticing and naming and punishing the Jew. (See: Auschwitz, et al.) The Jews have no problem with black people thinking of themselves as a team, because blacks don’t have the long term organizational and thinking and planning skills to translate that tribal mentality into hassling the Jews, or anyone else, besides other black people. We, OTOH, have lots of superior capabilities and talents and hardware, but they are in the hands, minds and hearts of people who are brainwashed with white guilt and virtue signaling and pathological altruism, thanks in no small part to our parenthetical friends. All we can do with it is defend ourselves individually or in small groups for short stretches, but the Jews do their level best to make sure we don’t take it any further.

(2) The United States still has plenty of room to sprawl. Sprawl is a critical American racial pressure valve. As long as it’s easy for white people to run away from the black undertow in terms of a daily residential sense, which necessarily ties in to the elementary, middle and secondary education sense (see below), white people won’t feel any need to combat the ghetto undertow. Once sprawl becomes politically, economically or ecologically impossible, then all bets are off.

(3) In spite of this news, and the many other stories like these, and relating to reason (2) above, generally, white and black Americans generally don’t personally despise each other like that, not to the pot-boiling-over level it would take to provoke a race war, even if there was nothing else preventing it. The reason for that is that to the extent that white people and black people are in each others’ social, business and acquaintance circles, they are alike in some substantial way, if it’s a circle of well-behaved people, then the kind of black people that white people know personally are more like themselves than the median for black people. A statistical piece of evidence to back this up, in case you don’t already think it’s true, is that, nationally, the white-over-black academic performance gap is one standard deviation, to match the IQ gap. However, within a school district, the same achievement gap (and presumably also the IQ gap) is only 0.6 standard deviation. That figure is the median intra-district black-white achievement gap for all American public school districts, of course, your mileage may vary. Because public school districts are closely linked to housing, housing values, neighborhoods, individual real estate selection, SES sorting. As a smart man recently put it, “So for most public school students and their parents, the racial gap they experience in their daily lives isn’t as large as it is nationally, which probably helps Americans get along a little better.”

For instance, I don’t have a single black person in my direct personal social circles. If I did, they would be people who are like myself or compatible with myself in some way.  Even the few black people who hang around this space, that’s the case. What this means is that if I didn’t know better, if I wasn’t deeply red pilled, (praise Kek that I am), if anyone tried to run up on me and get me to join the Rahowa against black people, I’d tell them to beat it, because I wouldn’t have the necessary personal animus to do so. Because I actually do know better, again, thanks red pill and praise Kek, I’d be more tempted in reality. Meanwhile, the kind of white people that regularly cavort with the ghetto black undertow are generally the kind of white people that most white people want nothing to do with, and would want nothing to do with even if white people were the only kind of people in existence. Lower SES white people do have the personal animus toward black people to make things really hot; the trouble is, these are the kind of white people who really aren’t better than the black people they hate.

SES sorting is probably the crucial pressure valve which prevents the outbreak of a race war. But, once again, if it ever stops being possible, and I can seriously envision a few real world reality-based scenarios where it does stop, then all bets are off.





Who Is Missing? Good Question.

11 04 2016

Clayton

Read it, but here’s the money:

Adelaide Lancaster of Webster Groves and Laura Horwitz of Clayton, started organizing the We Stories nonprofit last year, looking for a way they could respond to Ferguson as parents of young children.

Before that:

Every month, We Stories organizes reading resources, discussion aids and events around a theme. The events can include history walking tours, storytimes, coffee chats and anti-racism workshops by the Anti-Defamation League. For example, in a month with a theme of “neighborhoods,” We Stories would feature a book that comes with discussion questions for families like: Who’s missing from your neighborhood? Does everyone look alike or different?

Adelaide Lancaster and Laura Horwitz ought to move out of evil Webster Groves and evil Clayton, where black people are sorely missing (*), and move to north city.

Also:

A frequently cited 2007 study in the Journal of Marriage and Family showed that nonwhite families talk about race three times as often as white families do, and that the majority of white families don’t talk about race.

Because white people are told not to think tribally, not to notice race, that there’s no such thing as race in reality, that it’s just a social construct.

(*) – Officially, Clayton is 8% black, but in reality, its residential sections aren’t even 1% black.  What explains the disconnect?  “Officially” means U.S. Census Bureau, and Census counts jail and prison inmates of residents of the geography where the jail or prison is on census day, not where the inmate lived before he got sent to jail or prison.  The seat of St. Louis County government and its “justice center” is in Clayton.  I just wanted to let you know that before snooty Claytonite tries to deceive you with that 8% legerdemain to make you think Clayton has diversity.





Another Obama Oldie

28 05 2015

Boston

Just as a lot of Jews think they have to reconstruct American society because their great-great-grandfathers couldn’t get into country clubs, Baraq Obama has to fundamentally transform the country because of the racial politics of high school parties in the latter half of the 1970s in Honolulu’s elite sector.

High schools and country clubs — That is the root of the sociology of what a lot of the left does.





Here’s Where the Coffee Meets the Road

20 03 2015

Seattle

Here’s a survey that they’re pushing:

starbucks-survey

I’ll take a crack cocaine at it.

1.  Zero

2.  Zero

3.  No kids

4.  No blacks

5.  None of the above

6.  Don’t do Zuckerbook

7.  One (Asian)

8.  One (Asian) (if you want to call my sardine box a “home”)

9.  Zero, and surprisingly no gays even though the work is partially PR.

10.  Two

Q1:  Thankfully, no.

Q2:  Yes, a black kid that was as nerdy as I was.  We still keep in touch on occasion, but we’re different people than we were in second through fourth grade.

Q3:  Black crime, white racial dispossession by means of mass immigration, and institutionalized hatred of non-connected non-elite white people.  You only asked for one, but I gave you three, and if you don’t like it, well then, screw you.





Too Many Movies

28 05 2014

Madison, Wisconsin

5359dfb6d5f77.preview-620

You say “honest dialogue about race,” I say “watching too many movies.”





I Can’t Imagine Why

27 10 2012

America

AP:

AP poll: Majority harbor prejudice against blacks

Racial attitudes have not improved in the four years since the United States elected its first black president, an Associated Press poll finds, as a slight majority of Americans now express prejudice toward blacks whether they recognize those feelings or not.

Those views could cost President Barack Obama votes as he tries for re-election, the survey found, though the effects are mitigated by some people’s more favorable views of blacks.

Racial prejudice has increased slightly since 2008 whether those feelings were measured using questions that explicitly asked respondents about racist attitudes, or through an experimental test that measured implicit views toward race without asking questions about that topic directly.

In all, 51 percent of Americans now express explicit anti-black attitudes, compared with 48 percent in a similar 2008 survey. When measured by an implicit racial attitudes test, the number of Americans with anti-black sentiments jumped to 56 percent, up from 49 percent during the last presidential election. In both tests, the share of Americans expressing pro-black attitudes fell.

“As much as we’d hope the impact of race would decline over time … it appears the impact of anti-black sentiment on voting is about the same as it was four years ago,” said Jon Krosnick, a Stanford University professor who worked with AP to develop the survey.

Most Americans expressed anti-Hispanic sentiments, too. In an AP survey done in 2011, 52 percent of non-Hispanic whites expressed anti-Hispanic attitudes. That figure rose to 57 percent in the implicit test. The survey on Hispanics had no past data for comparison.

Translation:  We’re winning.

Now, the next trick is to get this translated into public policy.  Easier said…

The AP is wrong in this regard:  At least according to my reading, racial attitudes have improved in the last four years.





“Race Mattered”

9 08 2012

First Congressional District

So it’s not just a social construct?

P-D:

Black voters powered Lacy Clay’s victory

William Lacy Clay trounced fellow Democrat Russ Carnahan with more than 90 percent of the vote in some north St. Louis wards, and beat him more than 2-to-1 in north St. Louis County, data from Tuesday’s congressional primary show.

Clay and Carnahan, two sitting congressmen, battled it out for the new 1st Congressional District, St. Louis’ one remaining U.S. House seat. City figures show that Clay, who is black, won the primary by dominating in largely African-American areas of St. Louis. Carnahan, who is white, drew the bulk of his support from more predominantly white wards on the south and west sides.

There were some exceptions to the larger pattern. Clay did well in upscale, mixed-race areas of the city like the Central West End. And even in the most predominantly white city wards on the south side, Carnahan never broke 78 percent.

But overall, the numbers confirm what was increasingly evident during the campaign: Race mattered.

(snip)

By the time the crowd gathered at St. Louis Gateway Classic Sports Foundation on the near north side Tuesday for Clay’s election-night party, all pretense of a colorblind congressional primary had been pretty much abandoned by his supporters.

“He’s a brother. He has good ideas,” said Walter Grace, 67, a retired teacher of black history, who gathered with about 150 other Clay supporters, most of them African-American.

Carnahan’s political family — including his father, the late Gov. Mel Carnahan — has long been allied with black city Democrats. Carnahan’s decision to run against Clay this year created resentment and strained that biracial coalition, judging from the comments of others at Clay’s gathering Tuesday.

“The Carnahans are like family,” said Floyd Blackwell, an African-American alderman in Cool Valley. “When family attacks you, it hurts worse. It’s like burning a bridge in the black community.

(snip)

Maurice Jones, 57, of north city’s Penrose neighborhood, said he viewed Clay as the most important African-American elected official in the state. “For the black people, so we can have a voice, as blacks,” he said. “We need to hold on to what we have.”

We also have white liberals getting their comeuppance in the same article.

The reason Carnahan “never broke 78%” in the whitest ward in St. Louis City is that even the whitest ward in the city has a noticeable number of blacks.