Your Blogmeister’s Desk
In our sphere, we often discuss the tragic central irony of the left and its constituent parts. Our case has this scaffolding: The left is undermining that which it necessarily depends on to succeed in order to acquire enough power to implement its agenda. From there, all you need are proper nouns and particularities.
One such example of proper nouns and particularities is BLM. They hate the cops, but need the cops to enforce the system which they need to fulfill their agenda. Deray McKesson despises the Baltimore Police Department but now “works” for the Baltimore City Public Schools, an institution whose finances heavily depend on the Baltimore Police Department collecting taxes from unwilling city property owners. Of course, I don’t think BLM and Deray really hate the cops, they’re just pretending they do in order to leverage the black undertow’s contempt for cops in order to play it against white pathological altruism in order to extract benefits for themselves. Hence, Deray’s sinecures.
Another such example is one that you’ve read often if you read your Sailer like you all should. It’s the “running out of white kids” doctrine. The left wants to demote white people from majority status in the country, but at the same time thinks that the social problems of non-Asian minorities can be solved by spreading them out among white people, using white people as a buffer for NAM social dysfunction (e.g. school deseg, AFFH). I think the modern left with power, because they are mostly baby boomers, live under a demographic delusional fantasy that the country they run still has the same kind of demographics that the country had when they were kids. They behave as if the country is 89% native-born white, 10% black and 1% others.
I figured out this morning, over my OJ, that the left isn’t the only universe that suffers from the syndrome of the tragic central irony.
Hence, modern constitutional conservatism.
If I had a dime for every time I read or heard one of our kind of people pop off about some pie in the sky fantasy about adding constitutional amendments, or repealing constitutional amendments, or something of the like, I’d be able to buy out Gates and Zuckerberg several times over. The problem is that if we had the kind of power it takes to do that, then we actually wouldn’t do that, because we wouldn’t waste or time with that; we’d be doing other more forceful more impactful things. Our constitutional fantasies usually revolve around compensating for our inability to acquire power, but in order to make those constitutional changes, we’d need to acquire power. But once we acquire power, we’d have power, so why should we bother with the constitutional changes? The reason we don’t have that kind of power is because we waste our time hem hawing over a piece of paper and its supposed magical ability to save us.
The difference between our tragic central irony and the left’s is that the left’s are of the sort that will eventually undermine their victories and their agenda that they have fulfilled because they have power, while ours puts us in a vicious cycle which prevents us from competing for power.
Nice post. Any time I accidentally hear Mark Levin shouting into the mic, it’s often about something like this. I suspect he knows what you’re saying is true, but to admit that would be to lose revenue. And we can’t have that, now can we?
Another one of yesterday’s men.
With Mark Levin, I think it’s just a matter of dyed in the wool ideology. The online encyclopedia of questionable credibility lists his age as 59, and I’ve heard him say he’s been political since age 13. That’s 46 years, coming up on a half century, of one given way of thinking; people who have been doing something for that long just can’t stop and shift and change and pivot on a dime. Your ever-lovin’ snarky blogmeister, snarkiest bastard on the internets, is 39, and has been actively political since 16, and therefore, I’m not old enough and haven’t been at it long enough such that I haven’t been able to pivot. I’ve made three major political pivots in my life: From normiecon to Bircher type at 17, then from Bircher type to democratic republican constitutionalist lite-libertarian racialist at 20, and then from that to neoreactionary racialist at 37.
(((Levin))) is not one of us. It matters not whether he wears red or blue, its what is good for the jew. They aren’t really monolithic, they’re just self-centered uncaring idiots with no grasp of the big picture. They really believe their garbage of how much WE need (((Them))). In Truth, we need them like cancer, and without US((( they))) are Soylent Green. Yes, Soylent Green is people. Useless and superfluous people who trust fine young cannibals.
OT, but have you seen that picture of Trump Jr’s wife and daughters he posted on Twitter? I don’t know what’s funnier, that it makes Sally Kohn types horny and furious at the same time, or that they can’t tell people (((outside of a Jewish cat lady meeting))) that it makes them furious. Why can’t I post a picture on this blog!
I presume you mean this:
Yes, that’s it. Just posting that, with no story or anything…you just know it pisses off all the right people.
Coaching Program
The Tragic Central Irony of Constitutional Conservatism | Countenance Blog
attraction marketing seminars
The Tragic Central Irony of Constitutional Conservatism | Countenance Blog