Nothing More Than Feelings

29 09 2014


FAIL and FAIL again:

Extremists will have to get posts on Facebook and Twitter approved in advance by the police under sweeping rules planned by the Conservatives.

They will also be barred from speaking at public events if they represent a threat to “the functioning of democracy”, under the new Extremist Disruption Orders.

Theresa May, the Home Secretary, will lay out plans to allow judges to ban people from broadcasting or protesting in certain places, as well as associating with specific people.

The plans — to be brought in if the Conservatives win the election in May — are part of a wide-ranging set of rules to strengthen the Government’s counter-terrorism strategy.


The Home Secretary will also introduce “banning orders” for extremist groups, which would make it a criminal offence to be a member of or raise funds for a group that spreads or promotes hatred. The maximum sentence could be up to 10 years in prison.

The new orders will be part of the Government’s “Prevent” strategy, which tackles the ideology behind the terrorist threat. So-called hate preachers, who currently stay just within terrorism legislation, will be one of the targets of banning orders and Extremism Disruption Orders (EDOs).


EDOs would apply if a judge is convinced that an individual is carrying out their activities for “the purpose of overthrowing democracy”.

Emphasis added, for a very important reason.

Britain’s “anti-terrorism” efforts are the same kind of slap-happy failure as ours are, for much the same reason.


It’s like I wrote yesterday in this space:  We’re responding to tribal threats with an ideological response.  Instead of shipping the non-white Muslims out of Britain, the “best” they can do is concoct a bunch of Rube Goldberg legal devices (which will anarcho-tyrannically be enforced mainly on right-wing whites, mark me) based on the pretense that non-white Muslims are only bad because they’re “extreme” or “hateful” or oppose duhmocrazy.  (Meanwhile, I can find a hateful extremist that opposes duhmocrazy on the other side of the mirror.)  An earlier version of this article said that these generic extremists (don’t say “Muslim”) are causing “community tensions.”  Which means they’re hurting people’s feelings.

So here’s the fight song to Britain’s anti-Muslim terrorism efforts:

Stuns of Silence

29 09 2014



Weeks before he will reportedly enact a massive executive amnesty for illegal immigrants, President Barack Obama was silent on immigration when he addressed the Congressional Black Caucus’ Phoenix Awards Dinner on Saturday evening in Washington, D.C.

Yeah, I’m scratching my increasingly gray hair on that one, too. No, really I am.

I don’t see why Obama would have thought that mentioning open borders would have made the CBC members mad or upset. Just about all of them are open borders all the way. That’s because they’re more concerned about electing a new people to help YAY BLUE TEAM which will in turn help CBC members. Also, almost all CBC members don’t have to worry about black voters turning on them over immigration.  Sure, the immigration surge is going to hurt black workers, but they’re not going to take their anger out on their CBC-member Congressman.  (Dirty little secret:  This is why they want so badly for some bipartisan immigration amnesty bill with the fingerprints of at least one Republican on it.  This way, Obama/CBC/Democrats can channel black immigration anger at Republicans.)

All pros, no cons, so why not?

And also, screwing over white people.

Give Barack Obama a Dictionary

29 09 2014

Washington, D.C.

And have him look up “median.”

President Obama said to Steve Kroft that the main disconnects between all this great economic growth that’s going on and median income growth (or the lack thereof) are:

*  That the minimum wage has not been raised
*  The gender pay gap
*  The lack of infrastructure spending

Even if the minimum wage is raised and it does not result in more unemployment, it will not result in median personal income increasing, because it would only raise the incomes of lower income earners, the left tail of the income distribution bell curve (which probably also corresponds to the left tail of that other kind of bell curve), and the statistical definition of “median” is the middle data point, or the average of the two at the middle if there is no exact middle.  Yes, it would raise the average, but not the median.  The reason the statisticians use median instead of average to examine personal incomes is that a small coterie of high income earners busts the curve and raises the average above the median.

There is no gender pay gap, ceteris paribus.

I thought the stimulus was supposed to bring about all this infrastructure spending.

But what is one big reason why median personal income is not increasing even though economic growth (supposedly) is?

Answer:  Mass immigration, open borders.

But don’t look for Obama to tell you that, because that’s what he wants, open borders.

Also, I think that the reason there is said officially to be “economic growth” is that a lot of questionable things are now counted as GDP.  Precisely to pad and feather bed the GDP so as to keep a second recession off of Obama’s hands.

We’re Closer Than We Think

29 09 2014


Instapundit linked to this Hot Air piece, the kind which I know most of you have read hundreds of times before.

I left this comment at Instapundit, which I am pleased to see has three likes so far:

Here’s something that bothers me here.

If you read these comments here on this Instapundit thread, and the comments over at the Hot Air article, not only do most people leaving comments get it, the comments read like the high quality comments that would have been written if this story was an American Renaissance thread.

What frustrates me, though, is that in spite of that, most people here and at Hot Air are still spinning their wheels in the muck and mud of the laughable joke that is the useless incompetent “right” in this country and the Stupid Party that “represents” it.

Yes, we’re mad at the black undertow and obvious plain as the nose on your face media double standards. So what do most of us do? YAY RED TEAM on election day. And what does that get us? Rand Paul, who, in case you haven’t notice, is getting worse and worse with his black pandering by the month.

Plain words, the Republican Party by and large isn’t going to do anything about these kinds of problems.

But there’s another more fundamental reason why we’re stuck in the mud. As long as the official right is neoconservative slash lamestream conservative slash right-libertarian slash classical liberal slash Lincolnian-egaliatarian, the official right will be mostly useless in trying to combat the black undertow and media double standards. That’s because we’re responding to tribal problems by leaning on ideology instead of being tribal ourselves. We delude ourselves into thinking that our enemies are ideologically inclined instead of what they really are, tribally inclined. Therefore, we’re stuck with ideological responses when we should be engaging in tribal responses.

That means, among other things, the official right should be far less ideological and far more ethnonationalist.

BTW, what good will the Republican Party do us when it comes to these problems when their official summer get-togethers are called LINCOLN Days?

I think the reason that so many people getting it has not yet resulted in quality change in public policy is that most of us are still living under the delusion that we can vote our way out of our racial problems.  Aside from what I wrote in the comment.


29 09 2014


Oh how I wish a polar vortex would arrive soon.

You own those streets?  Really?  Show me your deeds to the streets’ right-of-way.  Can you sell the streets you own at any time you want to someone else for money?  Can you open and close the streets at will?  Can you put up a toll booth and collect money from cars that want to drive on the street?

You don’t have any, no, no and no, in that order.  So you don’t own the streets.

Of course, they can and do “own” the streets in the sense that they’re taking advantage of white people being in an ideological drunken stupor.  And if we don’t sober up, the mahogany mobs will own those streets out of the pure force of warm bodies and the will to power.

But in the few rare instances when white people get their acts together, to tear down housing projects for the sake of some sort of urban renewal or gentrification project, they find out how much they really own those streets.  They can’t own the streets when not only do they not own the residential structures on those streets, we’re paying their rent.

We’re Doin’ It Right

28 09 2014

Washington, D.C.


President Barack Obama on Saturday said the widespread mistrust of law enforcement that was exposed by the fatal police shooting of an unarmed black man in Ferguson, Missouri, is corroding America, not just its black communities, and that the wariness flows from significant racial disparities in the administration of justice.


Obama addressed the Michael Brown shooting carefully but firmly, saying the young man’s death and the raw emotion that sprang from it had reawakened the country to the fact that “a gulf of mistrust” exists between local residents and law enforcement in too many communities.

“Too many young men of color feel targeted by law enforcement — guilty of walking while black or driving while black, judged by stereotypes that fuel fear and resentment and hopelessness,” he said.

That’s a feature, not a bug.  Black thugs should mistrust white cops.  God help us when the day comes that they don’t.  Then TS is really going to HTF.

Should nails trust hammers?

He said significant racial disparities remain in the enforcement of law, from drug sentencing to applying the death penalty, and that a majority of Americans think the justice system treats people of different races unequally.

He is correct.  White people get harsher sentences for drug crimes ceteris paribus, and white men who are convicted of first-degree murder are twice as likely to be executed than black men who are convicted of first-degree murder.



No Voter Fraud

28 09 2014

Bridgeport, Connecticut


And this one is an actual elected politician.

Not so long ago, I would have been really steamed at stories like these.  Now I realize that voter fraud is just an inevitable consequence of duhmocrazy and especially the worship thereof.  I used to think that we needed really complicated and convoluted and really heavy handed ways to solve voter fraud.  Now I think it’s simple:  There can’t be any voter fraud if there isn’t any voting.  That would also take care of the problem of too much money in elections.  Can’t have too much money ruining elections if there are no elections.

Notice she, and yes, SHE, was recently popped for domestic violence.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,685 other followers